Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John McCain's Keating Five Problem In 97 Seconds

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 11:25 AM
Original message
John McCain's Keating Five Problem In 97 Seconds

McCain Comments On Involvement In Keating Five: ‘It Was A Very Unhappy Period In My Life’

During the savings and loan scandal in the late 1980s, Charles Keating — a wealthy Arizona businessman and chairman of the failed Lincoln Savings and Loan Association — turned to John McCain to ask for his assistance as he was trying to stave off the government intervention. Keating found a champion for deregulation in McCain.

Soon after arriving in Congress, McCain flew on Keating’s corporate plane to vacations in the Bahamas. He “did not pay for most of the trips until years later, when the matter became public.” By 1987, “McCain had received about $112,000 in political contributions from Keating and his associates.” McCain was investigated and ultimately admonished by the Senate ethics committee. Keating went to prison.

McCain’s involvement in the “last great financial scandal in our country” has largely been ignored by the media. But local Ohio reporter Tom Beres finally forced McCain to comment on the Keating Five scandal in an interview yesterday. “Talk of greedy bankers, lax regulation brings back memories of the Keating Five,” Beres reported:

BERES: Is there some relevance of that chapter, which I think you have acknowledged was maybe not your proudest moment?

MCCAIN: It was a very unhappy period in my life. But the fact is that I moved forward and I have been the greatest voice for reform and against corruption in Washington than anybody.

Watch it:

<…>

McCain made his comments on the same day the New York Times reported that his campaign manager’s lobbying firm was receiving $15,000 monthly payments from Freddie Mac — a company that McCain has said is rife with “corruption.” Also on the same day, it was reported that McCain’s transition director made $260,000 lobbying for Freddie Mac. The New York Times reports McCain received $169,000 from “directors, officers, and lobbyists for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac” for the 2008 campaign cycle.

UPDATE Blogging at the Huffington Post, Jed Lewinson posts a video that explains the Keating Five scandal in 97 seconds:

(Video: http://thinkprogress.org/">John McCain's Keating Five Problem In 97 Seconds)





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
crazylikafox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for helping us simplify this complicated issue.
I think that's a big reason why it doesn't get much airtime. People think it's too complicated for the easy soundbite, and people are too stupid to understand it. Breaking it down to the basics help us frame it in a way we can really use show McCain to be the two-faced charlatan he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. McCain hasn't changed. He still has the Keating Five mentality
This article from 2000 and his present activities prove that.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. McCain against corruption more than anyone? Blow it out your ass, LIAR McCain. John Kerry has
Edited on Wed Sep-24-08 11:42 AM by blm
uncovered and exposed more government corruption than ANY LAWMAKER in modern history and you were NEVER there ONE TIME TO HELP HIM.

In fact, it was Kerry's uncovering of so many banking irregularities by Reagan and Bush's illegal operations in IranContra and BCCI that included the scrutiny of the S&Ls and YOUR problems, you lying sack of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. McCain is a liar.
He spent his entire time in the Senate providing cover for corrupt assholes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Cindy McCain AND her father are also involved in the scandal
That could be the bomb right there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Then perhaps I'm misunderstanding, or opensecrets has it wrong...
Edited on Wed Sep-24-08 01:43 PM by hughee99
It shows McCain as getting $21,550 from Freddie and Fannie since 1989, the article says a "different list including lobbyists and directors shows McCain getting more" but provides NO information on who's list it is or how much more McLame is getting.

Shoddy reporting, if you ask me.

http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/09/update-fannie-mae-and-freddie.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Shoddy reporting?
From the link to the specific amount in the OP:

The New York Times has published a separate list looking at contributions from "directors, officers, and lobbyists for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac" for the 2008 campaign cycle. That list — using figures from the Federal Election Commission — shows McCain receiving $169,000, while Obama received only $16,000.

Explaining the difference, the Center for Responsive Politics said on its Web site that it does not include members of the board of directors because they could serve on boards of various companies. Their contributions are listed along with other employees of the companies they work for. And the center says lobbyists usually represent multiple clients as well, so their contributions are listed under their lobbying firms — except in-house lobbyists, who are included in the center's list.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. So if Obama only received $16,000
from directors and lobbyists, and $104,000 from officers, while McCain received the vast majority of his money from Directors and lobbyists who represent multiple interests. Is this right?

In any case, I apologize, I was misreading it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Obama doesn't take money from lobbyists. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. self delete - Prosense's response is better.
Edited on Wed Sep-24-08 05:26 PM by karynnj
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. Rachel Maddow covering Keating.
Edited on Wed Sep-24-08 10:53 PM by ProSense
If you missed it earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC