Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Country's top economists advise Pelosi to say No to Paulsen bailout

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:15 AM
Original message
Country's top economists advise Pelosi to say No to Paulsen bailout
Edited on Fri Sep-26-08 01:17 AM by avaistheone1
To the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate:

As economists, we want to express to Congress our great concern for the plan proposed by Treasury Secretary Paulson to deal with the financial crisis. We are well aware of the difficulty of the current financial situation and we agree with the need for bold action to ensure that the financial system continues to function. We see three fatal pitfalls in the currently proposed plan:

1) Its fairness. The plan is a subsidy to investors at taxpayers’ expense. Investors who took risks to earn profits must also bear the losses. Not every business failure carries systemic risk. The government can ensure a well-functioning financial industry, able to make new loans to creditworthy borrowers, without bailing out particular investors and institutions whose choices proved unwise.

2) Its ambiguity. Neither the mission of the new agency nor its oversight are clear. If taxpayers are to buy illiquid and opaque assets from troubled sellers, the terms, occasions, and methods of such purchases must be crystal clear ahead of time and carefully monitored afterwards.

3) Its long-term effects. If the plan is enacted, its effects will be with us for a generation. For all their recent troubles, America's dynamic and innovative private capital markets have brought the nation unparalleled prosperity. Fundamentally weakening those markets in order to calm short-run disruptions is desperately short-sighted.

For these reasons we ask Congress not to rush, to hold appropriate hearings, and to carefully consider the right course of action, and to wisely determine the future of the financial industry and the U.S. economy for years to come.

Signed (updated at 9/25/2008 8:30AM CT)
Acemoglu Daron (Massachussets Institute of Technology)
Adler Michael (Columbia University)
Admati Anat R. (Stanford University)
Alexis Marcus (Northwestern University)
Alvarez Fernando (University of Chicago)
Andersen Torben (Northwestern University)
Baliga Sandeep (Northwestern University)
Banerjee Abhijit V. (Massachussets Institute of Technology)
Barankay Iwan (University of Pennsylvania)
Barry Brian (University of Chicago)
Bartkus James R. (Xavier University of Louisiana)
Becker Charles M. (Duke University)
Becker Robert A. (Indiana University)
Beim David (Columbia University)
Berk Jonathan (Stanford University)
Bisin Alberto (New York University)
Bittlingmayer George (University of Kansas)
Boldrin Michele (Washington University)
Brooks Taggert J. (University of Wisconsin)
Brynjolfsson Erik (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Buera Francisco J. (UCLA)
Camp Mary Elizabeth (Indiana University)
Carmel Jonathan (University of Michigan)
Carroll Christopher (Johns Hopkins University)
Cassar Gavin (University of Pennsylvania)
Chaney Thomas (University of Chicago)
Chari Varadarajan V. (University of Minnesota)
Chauvin Keith W. (University of Kansas)
Chintagunta Pradeep K. (University of Chicago)
Christiano Lawrence J. (Northwestern University)
Cochrane John (University of Chicago)
Coleman John (Duke University)
Constantinides George M. (University of Chicago)
Crain Robert (UC Berkeley)
Culp Christopher (University of Chicago)
Da Zhi (University of Notre Dame)
Davis Morris (University of Wisconsin)
De Marzo Peter (Stanford University)
Dubé Jean-Pierre H. (University of Chicago)
Edlin Aaron (UC Berkeley)
Eichenbaum Martin (Northwestern University)
Ely Jeffrey (Northwestern University)
Eraslan Hülya K. K.(Johns Hopkins University)
Faulhaber Gerald (University of Pennsylvania)
Feldmann Sven (University of Melbourne)
Fernandez-Villaverde Jesus (University of Pennsylvania)
Fohlin Caroline (Johns Hopkins University)
Fox Jeremy T. (University of Chicago)
Frank Murray Z.(University of Minnesota)
Frenzen Jonathan (University of Chicago)
Fuchs William (University of Chicago)
Fudenberg Drew (Harvard University)
Gabaix Xavier (New York University)
Gao Paul (Notre Dame University)
Garicano Luis (University of Chicago)
Gerakos Joseph J. (University of Chicago)
Gibbs Michael (University of Chicago)
Glomm Gerhard (Indiana University)
Goettler Ron (University of Chicago)
Goldin Claudia (Harvard University)
Gordon Robert J. (Northwestern University)
Greenstone Michael (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Guadalupe Maria (Columbia University)
Guerrieri Veronica (University of Chicago)
Hagerty Kathleen (Northwestern University)
Hamada Robert S. (University of Chicago)
Hansen Lars (University of Chicago)
Harris Milton (University of Chicago)
Hart Oliver (Harvard University)
Hazlett Thomas W. (George Mason University)
Heaton John (University of Chicago)
Heckman James (University of Chicago - Nobel Laureate)
Henderson David R. (Hoover Institution)
Henisz, Witold (University of Pennsylvania)
Hertzberg Andrew (Columbia University)
Hite Gailen (Columbia University)
Hitsch Günter J. (University of Chicago)
Hodrick Robert J. (Columbia University)
Hopenhayn Hugo (UCLA)
Hurst Erik (University of Chicago)
Imrohoroglu Ayse (University of Southern California)
Isakson Hans (University of Northern Iowa)
Israel Ronen (London Business School)
Jaffee Dwight M. (UC Berkeley)
Jagannathan Ravi (Northwestern University)
Jenter Dirk (Stanford University)
Jones Charles M. (Columbia Business School)
Kaboski Joseph P. (Ohio State University)
Kahn Matthew (UCLA)
Kaplan Ethan (Stockholm University)
Karolyi, Andrew (Ohio State University)
Kashyap Anil (University of Chicago)
Keim Donald B (University of Pennsylvania)
Ketkar Suhas L (Vanderbilt University)
Kiesling Lynne (Northwestern University)
Klenow Pete (Stanford University)
Koch Paul (University of Kansas)
Kocherlakota Narayana (University of Minnesota)
Koijen Ralph S.J. (University of Chicago)
Kondo Jiro (Northwestern University)
Korteweg Arthur (Stanford University)
Kortum Samuel (University of Chicago)
Krueger Dirk (University of Pennsylvania)
Ledesma Patricia (Northwestern University)
Lee Lung-fei (Ohio State University)
Leeper Eric M. (Indiana University)
Leuz Christian (University of Chicago)
Levine David I.(UC Berkeley)
Levine David K.(Washington University)
Levy David M. (George Mason University)
Linnainmaa Juhani (University of Chicago)
Lott John R. Jr. (University of Maryland)
Lucas Robert (University of Chicago - Nobel Laureate)
Luttmer Erzo G.J. (University of Minnesota)
Manski Charles F. (Northwestern University)
Martin Ian (Stanford University)
Mayer Christopher (Columbia University)
Mazzeo Michael (Northwestern University)
McDonald Robert (Northwestern University)
Meadow Scott F. (University of Chicago)
Mehra Rajnish (UC Santa Barbara)
Mian Atif (University of Chicago)
Middlebrook Art (University of Chicago)
Miguel Edward (UC Berkeley)
Miravete Eugenio J. (University of Texas at Austin)
Miron Jeffrey (Harvard University)
Moretti Enrico (UC Berkeley)
Moriguchi Chiaki (Northwestern University)
Moro Andrea (Vanderbilt University)
Morse Adair (University of Chicago)
Mortensen Dale T. (Northwestern University)
Mortimer Julie Holland (Harvard University)
Muralidharan Karthik (UC San Diego)
Nanda Dhananjay (University of Miami)
Nevo Aviv (Northwestern University)
Ohanian Lee (UCLA)
Pagliari Joseph (University of Chicago)
Papanikolaou Dimitris (Northwestern University)
Parker Jonathan (Northwestern University)
Paul Evans (Ohio State University)
Pejovich Svetozar (Steve) (Texas A&M University)
Peltzman Sam (University of Chicago)
Perri Fabrizio (University of Minnesota)
Phelan Christopher (University of Minnesota)
Piazzesi Monika (Stanford University)
Piskorski Tomasz (Columbia University)
Rampini Adriano (Duke University)
Reagan Patricia (Ohio State University)
Reich Michael (UC Berkeley)
Reuben Ernesto (Northwestern University)
Roberts Michael (University of Pennsylvania)
Robinson David (Duke University)
Rogers Michele (Northwestern University)
Rotella Elyce (Indiana University)
Ruud Paul (Vassar College)
Safford Sean (University of Chicago)
Sandbu Martin E. (University of Pennsylvania)
Sapienza Paola (Northwestern University)
Savor Pavel (University of Pennsylvania)
Scharfstein David (Harvard University)
Seim Katja (University of Pennsylvania)
Seru Amit (University of Chicago)
Shang-Jin Wei (Columbia University)
Shimer Robert (University of Chicago)
Shore Stephen H. (Johns Hopkins University)
Siegel Ron (Northwestern University)
Smith David C. (University of Virginia)
Smith Vernon L.(Chapman University- Nobel Laureate)
Sorensen Morten (Columbia University)
Spiegel Matthew (Yale University)
Stevenson Betsey (University of Pennsylvania)
Stokey Nancy (University of Chicago)
Strahan Philip (Boston College)
Strebulaev Ilya (Stanford University)
Sufi Amir (University of Chicago)
Tabarrok Alex (George Mason University)
Taylor Alan M. (UC Davis)
Thompson Tim (Northwestern University)
Tschoegl Adrian E. (University of Pennsylvania)
Uhlig Harald (University of Chicago)
Ulrich, Maxim (Columbia University)
Van Buskirk Andrew (University of Chicago)
Veronesi Pietro (University of Chicago)
Vissing-Jorgensen Annette (Northwestern University)
Wacziarg Romain (UCLA)
Weill Pierre-Olivier (UCLA)
Williamson Samuel H. (Miami University)
Witte Mark (Northwestern University)
Wolfers Justin (University of Pennsylvania)
Woutersen Tiemen (Johns Hopkins University)
Zingales Luigi (University of Chicago)
Zitzewitz Eric (Dartmouth College)


http://faculty.chicagogsb.edu/john.cochrane/research/Papers/mortgage_protest.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eshfemme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is this the same as when the Republicans listed scientists who were against man-made global warming?
The GOP had some list of "Nobel scientists" who dissented with the idea of a man-made global warming thing and then it turns out that a majority of them had their names added for erroneous reasons or without permission and even when they asked to have their names removed, the list still remained as is. Also, I'd rather an intelligent dissent other than just a list of doctorates/scholars since these people would be best equipped to do so.

I'm sorry but I need this list itself to be confirmed with additional research too-- just to confirm that these people actually approve of having their names on the list. My distrust of the government and the media is such that I need independent activist research into documents that people want me to trust at face value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KathieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I agree...
Anyone can make a list...I hope there is some investigating done to confirm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. lol, check this out. Your alter ego is at freeperville, responding to the same info
To: Revel
Are these the same economist who said NASDAQ was justified by the “new ecnonomy”, there was no housing bubble, and the foreign economies had decoupled from the US economy?

Were these among those geniuses?

I could post a list of 900 scientists who concluded man was responsible for global warming. Does that make it true?



28 posted on Thursday, September 25, 2008 11:02:09 AM by Freedom_Is_Not_Free

http://209.157.64.201/focus/f-news/2090307/posts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eshfemme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
22. Um... this bailout is kinda a freak incident in that it's actually bipartisan
in the approval or disapproval of this plan.

Sorry but this is a legitimate concern I have about this list. You can try to trivialize my concern by saying I'm being like a freeper troll but I also don't try to demonize people based on their associations until they've proven themselves to be insane (granted, it's a lot easier to make that snap judgment with most of the freepers). Even the most insane have their moments of clarity. Just saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #22
38. I apologize. I think you misunderstood my post, though
Edited on Fri Sep-26-08 12:14 PM by Emit
I agree that this is a bipartisan issue, and a very serious one at that.

I thought it ironic, however, that to your comment: Is this the same as when the Republicans listed scientists who were against man-made global warming?

A freeper responds to the same list of Economists posted with his/her 'version': I could post a list of 900 scientists who concluded man was responsible for global warming. Does that make it true?

Quite telling how the same information is received with criticism, yet the critiques are so polar opposites.

My intent was certainly not to insult you - I find no issue with your comments, nor do I think you were being freeper-like. On the contrary, I only was pointing out the absurd alter ego position over at the other website with regard to the opposite position on global warming.

Sorry eshfemme, I should've been clearer in my post

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eshfemme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. I'm sorry for my paranoia.
I just wanted the problem I had with this list addressed and I apologize for overreacting too.

I think it's probably because the freepers are such a huge source of deserved ridicule that I thought the comparison was meant to be mocking but I see that it is not. Thanks for clarifying. :)

And yes, the freeper reply on that is weird when the same anti-intellectual GOP Rep from Alabama is using the very same tactic that the freeper is deriding. It's all just weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. A lot of economist are idiots
Seriously, the field isn't an exact science, and many economists have crackpot theories on how the world should work and political agendas.

There are some good economists out there, but just because you have a degree, doesn't make you an expert on government policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 04:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
36. Yes, like Milton Freidman...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Well I have a link here that will save you alot of time. They have already vetted it for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. Hmmm...
GOP doctors Nobel list to kill global climate change initiatives vs. Economists from the top colleges and universities in the nation protest the economic plan trying to be shoveled through by the GOP.
:dilemma:


My guess this list of these "liberal elite academics" is the real deal. Our side doesn't have to lie. If you can name a comparable ploy by Dems or progressives in the last decade, I'd like to hear it. Otherwise, this is just casting aspersions on what is most likely a valid statement from people who understand economics much better than Paulson. Bogus names on a list is very Rovian, and I don't think any progressive would stoop this low to make up a list of people who are really just talking economic common sense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eshfemme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. Well I'm questioning it because of the GOP Rep from Alabama who was waving a 5 page paper
that he claimed had all these economics experts from all these elite colleges that they normally sneer at. So that's why I'm skeptical about the source of this.

I'm open to hearing this dissent but I'd rather that there be an actual logical argument for why the bailout is bad other than it gives money to Wall Street because that's political rhetoric that's not cutting it for me anymore. So if it's really economists who say this, I want to know why so I can be more well-informed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 03:46 AM
Response to Reply #20
33. There was an actual argument
It was in the position paper the economists allegedly signed onto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
44. A GOP politician from Alabama put out a list of lies?
Edited on Fri Sep-26-08 03:58 PM by intheflow
You're citing THAT as the cause of your concern over this list of economic professors objecting to the bailout. Look, once you say "Alabama" and "Republican" in the same breath, you know it's fraudulent right off the bat. Meanwhile, this list was not touted by any Democratic candidate or office-holder, so your comparison of the two still seems like a stretch.

But just to make you feel better, here's a link to the University of Chicago's School of Business with the same info as the OP, posted on signer John Cochrane's faculty page. That should validate the list for you, O Doubting Thomas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. That list came from here:


I'm not kidding you:

http://www.oism.org/




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. I think that one guy used to fix espresso machines down in Eugene 30 years ago....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Could be- Who can say?
It's somewhere out and around Cave Junction.

Kinda wanted to go and have a look, but my SO wasn't having any of it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
35. Agreed. I'm surprised my proff wasn't listed. UPenn prof world famous and a Repub. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. .!.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. You are so bad
:spank:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Um......ESAD?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 03:40 AM
Response to Reply #13
32. Yes, her and Reid can dine together!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattP Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. If these guys were so smart we wouldn't be in this shitstorm in the first place
No Krugman on that list, besides they are beyond the Paulson proposal now they are looking at Dodds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. These people are academics not policy makers, they didn't put us here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. You got that right. Pelosi is trying to ignor these experts right now.
She saying something along the lines that she doesn't have time for academics.

(So true. And it shows Nancy.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Yes, it surely does show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. Is this the list referred to by the House Repukes
Edited on Fri Sep-26-08 01:37 AM by lapfog_1
who, along with new populist John McCain, torpedoed the deal today???

The ones who presented their own plan (soon to be the McCain plan) to eliminate the capital gains tax for investors, declare a two year moratorium on ANY corporate tax, asks for further radical deregulation of the financial markets, all in an attempt to attract the needed hundreds of billions from a newly energized "private sector". They also came out and said that they had hundreds of economists that opposed the bail out plan. Same list?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. They may have a list of economists that oppose the deal but these give no
mention that they support McCain's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. They were sure trying to give one the impression that the economists supported the
Edited on Fri Sep-26-08 02:17 AM by lapfog_1
House Repuke Alternative (soon to be called the McCain Prosperity Bill or something like that)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #27
37. How so? Their bailout objections are very sound and say nothing about supporting McCain.
Edited on Fri Sep-26-08 10:00 AM by avaistheone1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
16. pelosi will do whatever saves her 'do less than nothing' political career.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
17. A long list of which you know nothing about
other than copy & paste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
18. James K. Galbraith, Prominent Harvard progressive economist says "No" to Paulsen bailout
A Bailout We Don't Need

The point of the bailout is to buy assets that are illiquid but not worthless. But regular banks hold assets like that all the time. They're called "loans."

With banks, runs occur only when depositors panic, because they fear the loan book is bad. Deposit insurance takes care of that. So why not eliminate the pointless $100,000 cap on federal deposit insurance and go take inventory? If a bank is solvent, money market funds would flow in, eliminating the need to insure those separately. If it isn't, the FDIC has the bridge bank facility to take care of that.

Next, put half a trillion dollars into the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. fund -- a cosmetic gesture -- and as much money into that agency and the FBI as is needed for examiners, auditors and investigators. Keep $200 billion or more in reserve, so the Treasury can recapitalize banks by buying preferred shares if necessary -- as Warren Buffett did this week with Goldman Sachs. Review the situation in three months, when Congress comes back. Hedge funds should be left on their own. You can't save everyone, and those investors aren't poor.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/20...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. Don't tell all the arm chair economists who swallowed the Bush Bologna.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Uh huh.
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. Is anyone talking about bailing out hedge funds?
Maybe I missed that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
19. KR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
28. They're right. Let the bad companies fail. They earned it.
And NO, Chicken Littles, the sky will not fall. We will liquidate the bad companies, and the new companies will be stronger. Yes, if someone invested in the markets and their companies goes belly up, they lose their investment. That's called RISK. If you want a safe return, don't bet the bundle in the stock market.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abumbyanyothername Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #28
39. Don't bet the bundle in the stock market
Just bet our Social Security there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForeignSpectator Donating Member (970 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
30. These are not her constituents so she might actually listen here... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
34. My God, look at that list of academics.
It's enough to make you want to go back to college!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
40. K and R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bad Thoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
41. The Peltzman Effect in Action
I find it ironic that Sam Peltzman is on the list, who insists that people act recklessly when faced with new regulations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bad Thoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
42. Jeffrey Ely would make gov't the biggest landlord
Edited on Fri Sep-26-08 12:28 PM by Bad Thoughts
From Marginal Revolution:
True just sending money is not incentive compatible. But there is no reason to bail out homeowners. Just intervene in any mortgage default. Seize the property and continue making the mortgage payments. In the short run rent the property back to the homeowner.

This is what I have been advocating to my colleagues. I don't know why it is not under discussion. Before going with the arbitrary implememtation that Paulson is proposing now there should be some convincing argument that it's more efficient than this alternative. It is clearly the most direct approach and therefore should be the default (so to speak.)

So, we buy up all the banks or we buy up all the houses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC