Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin is "ATE UP" --or the restaurant terms "in the weeds"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 04:56 AM
Original message
Palin is "ATE UP" --or the restaurant terms "in the weeds"
Edited on Fri Sep-26-08 05:11 AM by underpants
We had this saying in the Army. Sometimes a guy would get so scared of screwing up that all they think about is not screwing up (and getting punished) that they don't focus on the task in front of them and continue to screw up. It is a nasty vicious circle. I saw it happen to people first hand and it is not pretty.

Waitstaff and people in the restaurant industry use the term "in the weeds" for just being overwhelmed with tables.

The way to remedy it is to give this simple basic tasks so they can't help but complete them and then you praise them. Eventually everyone gets out of it but it tough to watch, like this.

Palin appears to be "ate up"
The CBS interview was a disaster. As I posted on another thread Chuck Todd said that Republicans are telling him that the McCain campaign screwed up by not just letting her get out there-sell herself, sell Sarah Palin. Her impromptu taking questions on a sidewalk in NYC the other day could very well be a decision to just let her jump in the cold water and get wet.

I posted this twice before I turned on a repeat of AC360. They just finished a conversation about Palin. I turned it on just as Ed Rollins (Repub strategist) said "she has lost all her confidence" Begala agreed that candidate confidence is key and added a baseball analogy about throwing a pitcher right back out there after a bad start.

She's ATE UP. She has been hit so hard by feedback (from inside the campaign more than from outside) that she can't focus on just sticking to what got her where she is-which is basically using talk radio issues/language and riding that train like the rest of the Republicans do.

She is flat out ATE UP you can see it in her eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. the root problem is that she is wholly unqualified and unprepared for the job.
sure she is as cocky as hell but its not backed up with anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 05:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Yes but you can train anyone up for anything
they clearly overwhelmed her in the debate prep.

"cocky as hell but its not backed up with anything" sounds familiar--W, Duncan Hunter, Hannity, Sessions, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. incredible as this may seem i think she is even less qualified and cockier that w.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 05:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yup, but by the same token
some who are in the situation simply cannot admit it. Their egos refuse to believe that they come off as bad as they actually sound. And they often are surrounded by "yes" people. There just isn't any way to get to them and take them through the exercise.

the surprising thing is that while her government experience is limited, she has been elected to governor of Alaska... and I assume that she had to sit down with some TV interviewers and do some debates (I've seen video of both and she did OK in both of the videos I saw).

I think the problem is that they filled her head with talking points (you can see it that she simply MUST say "shore up the economy" and "it's all about jobs" even when the question has nothing to do with those answers). She is like Kelley Bundy getting ready for the trivia contest. Her head can only hold so many facts before it starts losing one for every new one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
five_horizons Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm actually starting to feel sorry for her
I know I shouldn't. She's a horrible human being. But I guess that's the "liberal sympathy" in me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 05:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Welcome to DU
:hi:

on a human level everyone is feeling sorry for her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
five_horizons Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Thanks!
I finally decided to de-lurk and start posting. I've been reading this board ever since the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 05:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. and you stuck around?
:wow:

:bounce: :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snake in the grass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. Not I.
She is first and foremost a danger and if some feel that is dehumanizing then I can live with it. She has chosen her path and I think people like Palin misuse the sympathy they are given to advance their own interests at the cost and peril of others. Do I wish her physical suffering? No, but I do wish her public humiliation and professional downfall because as long as she is in the position she is in, she can do real and great harm. The liberal mindset is more towards compromise, so we discuss an issue and draw a line. The regressives amongst us cross that line, so we go back to discussing and compromising, draw another line and this one is crossed as well. At some point we must stop drawing lines. We must say to here and no further. Palin, and those like her, need to return to the rocks from under whence they came.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 05:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. I feel sorry for her to --to an extent
however, she took on a job that she knew she was unqualified for and the arrogance that she showed at the convention set her up for this. For the "good" of the country, she should have said, "no thanks, let someone do it who can do this job right" and step aside. Of course, this is republicans we are talking about...:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kind of Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 06:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. "...the arrogance that she showed at the convention set her up for this."
So awfully true. She was downright mean and nasty, even compared herself to a pit bull, and that was an insult to the breed. I was taught never to gloat even when someone contemptible falls, but how can one feel sorry for Palin when she charges rape victims for testing kits? How can one feel sorry for her reveling in killing wolves to increase prey population for the pleasure of hunters? How about no choice for abortion when you're raped or an incest victim? There's just too much horror associated with her. To me, this is not the time to get soft and give this woman a break because I feel very, very sorry for us if McPalin wins this election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. She's like a wolf being hunted by airplane- very fitting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. And she has 40+ days more of this to get through. TBSS. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kind of Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. Yeah, what goes around comes around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
12. Confidence can't hide stupid.
I know lots of jerks who are dumb as a box of rocks but confident as hell. Oblivious, yes, but supremely confident. She was stupid before she got negative feedback and lost her confidence and I'm quite sure she has maintained the same level of stupidity throughout her candidacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
16. "Ate up" is such a great term.
It began, it seems, as a polite alternative to "fucked up." The drill sergeants told us they used it because they weren't officially allowed to curse. Naturally, it soon devolved into "ate the fuck up," which I always found a hilarious circumlocution.

Palin is ate up, all right. She is eaten the fuck up with ate-upness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. I saw it more at my permanent duty station
You had guys who were just torn up and ate the F(#$ up! as you so accurately put it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
remember2000forever Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. "In The Woods" is what Flight Attendants called being overwhelmed by Pax
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. What's "Pax" in this context? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
remember2000forever Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. Short for "Passengers"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
19. My father calls it "freezing up" ........
I mentioned this the other day, but my father is a minister, an attorney and the 1960 Champion of the Missouri State Forensic League debate competition. He said after watching her Couric interview "she freezes" meaning that it's not that she doesn't KNOW what she's talking about, but that if she gets flustered, her brain just locks up and she stops. We saw that several times last night.

Apparently it's not something that can be trained away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian_rd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
21. Haha! Kick for "Ate up" - Brings back memories.
(I was never in the military, but was in the Cadet Corps at Texas A&M)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medicswife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
22. ROFLMAO
That's EXACTLY how my husband and I have been referring to her lately. ATE UP. Yup, we're Army too, go figure. Just like right now the whole damned Army is Ate Up.

Go figure. The Republican Party has been in control for too long now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
24. I used to work in a restaurant - didn't know "in the weeds" was
a term still in use... but, I knew many a server who was out in the weeds. I had always thought it a double-entendre type reference because "weed" also is slang for marijuana.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC