Kerry Must Say It Is His Turn To Ask Bush A Question

Kerry stood up and answered Bush's question about "knowing what you know today, would you vote the same" (And then changing the question after Kerry had answered).

Kerry's turn:

Are we safer having rushed to war in March?

Are safer having literally ignored State Department plans for the post-invasion peace?

Are we safer having used warlords against Osama bin Laden in Tora Bora instead of the U.S. military?

Are we safer by setting the conditions for the Abu Ghraib abuses?

Are we safer having delayed the 9/11 Commissions findings through endless stonewalling?

Are we safer for failing to apply the Powell Doctrine of overwhelming force in Baghdad? And I don't mean "shock and awe," I'm talking troop presence to set the tone for orer and stability. I'm talking about sufficient artillery support, sufficient supply lines. I'm talking about competently and successfully running a major military campaign.