|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 02:00 PM Original message |
Here is the Text to Pelosi's Speech....Not quite sure what the Repukes are angry about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems to Win (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
1. Thank you for posting the link. It's a big help to folks with creaky dial-ups, not to have to searc |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nc4bo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
2. Thank-you, I was just asking for a link to vid or some text. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riqster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
3. She blamed the mess on deregulation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
4. WTF??? I saw NOTHING to cause the thugs to wreck the economy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 02:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. I found all the mentions of "republican" and I think she mentioned them once. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 02:11 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. You found one that I didn't find then.. I saw zilch ! They are going to be sooo sorry, not for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oberliner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 05:01 PM Response to Reply #6 |
24. Her actual remarks do not entirely match the "as prepared for delivery" version |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golddigger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
7. Pelosi 'KNEW' this was not going to pass, but brought it up for vote anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zuiderelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 03:36 PM Response to Reply #7 |
19. No actually, there were enough Republican votes. They CHANGED their minds before the vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golddigger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 04:46 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Well, what about the 94 dem's who voted nay. You can't tell me she didn't know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zuiderelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 04:56 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. That's not the point. It was supposed to be (and should have been) BI-PARTISAN. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golddigger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 05:29 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. YES, it is the point. Only 30 dem's had to vote AYE and it would have passed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zuiderelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 07:49 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Well, gee, maybe it's because they were pressured to pull out all the protections for individuals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golddigger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-30-08 11:09 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. So spin it all the fuck you want then. I don't fucking care anymore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golddigger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
8. Dupe. Self delete... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golddigger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 03:01 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Even if the Repub's had their feelings hurt "94" dems voted "NAY." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
9. THAT is it? That is all she said? What a bunch of crybabys |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
10. They're anti-truth and don't like when their failures are pointed out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moondust (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
11. Pure partisan politics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CitizenLeft (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
13. THIS speech? THIS sent the Republicans screaming for mommy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrScorpio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
14. C-Span is rebroadcasting it right now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FVZA_Colonel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
15. It contained one refference to the Republicans, and thanked them for their bi-partisanship. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
16. She should have left out 'Democrats' and replaced it with 'Congress'-that said - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zuiderelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
17. Thanks for posting. That damns them. There's NOTHING in that that should cause them to risk our |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ceile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
18. Geez.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
20. What? You thought the Republicans were being straight-forward? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oberliner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
23. This text does not include her "ad libs" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
27. What the fuck was wrong with THAT? If the repukes feel threatened by THAT, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 02:26 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC