Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Study: polls may underestimate Obama support

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-08 07:01 PM
Original message
Study: polls may underestimate Obama support
In a reversal, a new study today says that polls my be UNDERestimating Barack Obama's support by 3 percent to 4 percent nationally.

The study by two researchers at the University of Washington suggests the country may be witnessing a reversal of the so-called Bradley effect, in which support for African-American candidates is overstated when people talk to pollsters but then vote against the candidate in the privacy of the polling booth.

Using data from 32 Democratic primaries this year, psychologist Anthony Greenwald and political scientist Bethany Albertson said they did find a Bradley effect of polls overestimating Obama's support in three states: California, New Hampshire and Rhode Island.

But they found what they called a reverse Bradley effect in 12 other states.

"The Bradley effect has mutated," Greenwald said. "We are seeing it in several states, but the reverse effect is much stronger."

A key reason, he said, is social pressure.

"If you call people on the phone today and ask who they will vote for, some will give responses influenced by what may be understood locally as the more desirable response," Greenwald said.

"It is easy to suppose that these people are lying to pollsters. I don't believe that. What I think is they may be undecided and experiencing social pressure which could increase their likelihood of naming the white candidate if their region or state has a history of white dominance. They also might give the name of the Republican if the state is strongly Republican."

He noted that blacks and whites in polls underestimated their support for Obama in such states as Indiana, Missouri, Montana, Oklahoma and South Dakota.

http://washingtonbureau.typepad.com/election2008/2008/10/study-polls-may.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. YES WE CAN! k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tosh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Now THAT'S what I've been saying!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's the "Obama Effect".
"Obama Effect" new proposed wikipedia article (though likely to be deleted as, basically, too new):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama_effect

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. That would be wonderful. Of course "may" isn't something you bank on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-08 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ah yes, the Yeldarb Effect.
I've been wondering if there is any concrete evidence of its existence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thesubstanceofdreams Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-08 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. The problem is that primaries are very different from the general election

Nate from fivethirtyeight.com did a similar analysis and reached the same conclusion. The problem is, it's not possible to extrapolate primary behavior to the GE.
Nevertheless, I remain cautiously optimistic that polls are underestimating Obama support slightly due to demographic reasons (many new young and African American voters, cell phone only voters, etc).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-08 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. well duh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-08 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. I am shocked--SHOCKED!!!!--
Edited on Thu Oct-09-08 07:09 PM by rocknation
that the polls might not be accruate...


rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-08 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. But hasn't the Bradley effect to do with exit polls?
People have little reason to lie, but asked face to face the situation might be different.
Not saying that they are wrong. Which I hope not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC