More Mika Vomit: McCain is Scrapy and he is good when he is down: He'll do it tonight!

She is definitely off her meds tonight!
:mad:

had on but got where could not take Scarborough or Mika, they are too bad to watch. Also, I do not think it does any good to send them emails because Scarborough relishes those emails and it tells him we are watching.

doesn't she drink all morning while she sits there with Joe?

She's never been right.

And these days, praising John McCain gets one ahead at MSNBC. That's why you have Brokaw, Gregory, Todd and Mika all tripping over themselves trying to kiss McCain's ass.

Irrespective of her politics, her personal conduct on Morning Joke is as offensive to the cause of women professionals as is the silliness of Sarah Palin. Women over 40 who CONTINUE to play that high school girl routine are an embarrassment to all the thoughtful, hard working, insightful women in America who daily deliver the goods.

Look at Erin Burnett on CNBC. She is so solid as a business analyst, and is great on TV. She's much more attractive than Mika or Sarah, but you never see her using those silly school girl affectations.

Losers every one




None of them are worthy to lick the dingle-berries off Sen. Obama's ass


clearly not a fair comparison

She's a low information news personality, which makes Citizen Joe feel much, much better about himself. She also makes Willie Geist look like a genius, and that's not easy.

I see post after post about this "Mika" character - I don't even know for sure who it is, though I think I have an idea. Funny how we spend so much time talking about predictable partisans.

After her stunning debut on "Race For The White House"

I don't watch ANYTHING with that whack job Mika.

Makes the day go by easier.

when she is on with Joe. She has made me sick in her praise of McCain and Palin.

Every time I watch her I can't believe her McCain bias! What an idiot!

McCain is a coward and the world will see it tonight! I hoping unhinged will be the term used tomorrow!

but they forget that it was an something which happened externally that brought him back. The republicans' 'winner takes all' also helped him. I think circumstances,not himself,earned him the nomination.Btw why couldn't he comeback in 2000.

All this 'strong when he is behind' is just like the town-hall bla bla noise made during the second debate.

And apparently his wife too...



:shrug:

has he ever faced a really tight, tough competition for Senate where he could be out-spent and out-maneuvered? Because I get the feeling, just based on some of the sloppy, dumb stuff I've seen this campaign, he may not have had to work for it lately, and like others have pointed out, it was more like his GOP oponents wiped out or cancelled out each other more than he pulled out some victory in the primary.

I don't know where the "good when he's down" idea could come from beyond, um, futiley putting on a good face so some people looking at him in a kind of benign light will think he tried really hard. And he has a chance to do well--but I don't think he will by going negative like some people have anticipated. I know of few situations in which a person ever says, "Say that to my face" without thinking of a knockout.