|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
redstate_democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-16-08 10:03 AM Original message |
Breaking: OHIO Sec. of State Petitions the U.S. Supreme Court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skooooo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-16-08 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
1. Well we already know what SCOTUS will do... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redstate_democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-16-08 10:05 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I know, fucking bastards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-16-08 10:25 AM Response to Reply #1 |
13. Sure glad the Democrats kept their powder dry rather than try to fillibuster. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-16-08 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
3. Go Jennifer! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-16-08 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
4. Regardless of the outcome, I think this is a wise move. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redstate_democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-16-08 10:10 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. I;m interested in hearing your opinion on this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-16-08 10:22 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Several reasons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-16-08 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
6. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redstate_democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-16-08 10:15 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. What if the Supreme Court refuses to hear the case or rules against the Sec. of State? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-16-08 10:23 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. Lot's of what if's, but you can only cross a bridge when you come to it. Not so? They have to try. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-16-08 10:34 AM Response to Reply #7 |
15. This is good strategy if they refuse to hear, then other states would be precluded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realitythink (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-16-08 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
8. It is a chance for them to salvage thier reputation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redstate_democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-16-08 10:17 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. So Stevens would be the only judge to review the case? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-16-08 10:35 AM Response to Reply #9 |
16. They aren't in session so the judge for the circuit reviews it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realitythink (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-16-08 10:48 AM Response to Reply #9 |
18. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-16-08 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
10. Well, Sammy Joe the GOP plumber's registration was recorded incorrectly, so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JMDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-16-08 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
14. Could this throw the entire election ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-16-08 10:39 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. I think it is too close to the election for the Supreme Court to negatively fuck around with the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 08:23 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC