Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner 1 - Republicans 0 (updated)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 11:16 AM
Original message
Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner 1 - Republicans 0 (updated)
Edited on Fri Oct-17-08 11:45 AM by ProSense
That's Zero



Republicans are toast.

Yes. She. Can.

Update:

Supreme Court Sides With Dems On Ohio Voting Case

By Zachary Roth - October 17, 2008, 11:59AM
In a ruling late this morning, the Supreme Court sided with Ohio's Democratic Secretary of State, who's in a dispute with the state GOP over voting.

Reports the AP:

The justices on Friday overruled a federal appeals court that had ordered Ohio's top elections official to do more to help counties verify voter eligibility.

Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner, a Democrat, faced a deadline of Friday to set up a system to provide local officials with names of newly registered voters whose driver's license numbers or Social Security numbers on voter registration forms don't match records in other government databases.

The ruling could make it easier to vote for thousands of Ohioans whose voter registration information did not match up with other government records.

And the McCain campaign has already responded. On a conference call with reporters just now, campaign manager Rick Davis said: "If you look at what the ruling said, it said that the Republican party didn't have standing in order to bring the suit, it didn't make a decision on the merits of the case." Davis added: "I think that the Secretary of State ought to do her job."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not this time!
Republicans prevented more than 350,000 voters in Ohio from casting ballots or having their votes counted -- enough to have put John Kerry in the White House.

link



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. After the elections of 2000 and 2004 we should all have learned how important
the position of a state's Secretary of State actually is. Imagine what would have happened in Ohio if Blackwell was still in charge. We need to realize how vitally important it is to elect Democratic secretaries of state if we want to keep an open and fair voting process in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Exactly. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenLeft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. YES YES YES.
We have 28 Dem govs now - the chances of stolen elections are MUCH less than they were in 2004. Gubernatorial races are just as important as senate races, if not more. True, we should remain diligent and vigilant against election fraud, but with Dems controlling the elections, we can block GOP fraudulent bullshit much more effectively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Not just Dems
... but smart Dems who understand technology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. SCOTUS Blog: Court blocks Ohio voter match order
Edited on Fri Oct-17-08 12:13 PM by ProSense

Court blocks Ohio voter match order

Friday, October 17th, 2008 12:11 pm | Lyle Denniston

The Supreme Court on Friday lifted a federal judge’s order that would have required Ohio election officials to set up new procedures to verify voter registration across the state in the weeks before the Nov. 4 balloting. The unsigned (”Per Curiam”) order is here. The order blunts an effort by the Ohio Republican Party to gain access to registration data that would enable it to challenge voters’ eligibility at polling places.

The state GOP had complained that the Ohio Secretary of State had violated her duty, under federal election procedures law, to share with county election boards the lists of voters whose names in a voter registration database do not match data in the state’s drivers’ license files. The GOP argued that the secretary of state had put a stop to required efforts to pass along the non-matching data so that local election officials could deal with it. Lack of matches could be the basis for challenges.

The Supreme Court said it was not expressing any opinion on whether the state official had violated any duty under federal law. But, it said, it was not persuaded that the federal law gives a private party — like the state GOP — a right to go to court to enforce those provisions in the Help America Vote Act.

Under that act, voters whose eligibility is challenged at the polls may have to file proveisional ballots, which would be counted only if their right to vote had been verified. Because Democrats have succeeded widely in efforts to register voters, it was generally assumed that such challenges in this election cycle would fall more heavily on that party than on the GOP. Tens of thousands of registrations might have been put in issue.

more






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Suck it, GOP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
specialed Donating Member (276 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. YES!
This had me shitting bricks. Literally. Large bricks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. America 1, Republicans 0 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. Ohio Repubs have nothing left. Voinovich calls Obama a "socialist." LOL!

Ohio Senator: Democrat Obama 'a socialist'

By DAN SEWELL Associated Press Writer

Published on Friday Oct 17, 2008

A Republican U.S. senator ramped up the criticism of Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama, calling the fellow senator a socialist.

Two-term Sen. George Voinovich, R-Ohio, was quoted Friday by The Daily Sentinel newspaper, which said he made the comment to a reporter Thursday while visiting the Meigs County Republican Party in southeast Ohio.

"He is left of Teddy Kennedy," Voinovich said. "With all due respect, the man is a socialist."

A spokesman for Voinvoich, who has also served as Ohio governor and mayor of Cleveland, said Friday the senator stands by the description.

"He believes that Barack Obama is seriously considering a redistribution of wealth and he also has come to believe that Barack Obama has no appreciation of the 10th Amendment," spokesman Chris Paulitz said.

more




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC