Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What poll was the most accurate in 2004?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 10:06 AM
Original message
What poll was the most accurate in 2004?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CatBO Donating Member (713 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. I read that RCP was very accurate...
And I believe electoral-vote.com was quite accurate as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. What's RCP?
Edited on Fri Oct-24-08 10:14 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
Real Clear Politics isn't a poll...It compiles polls...

Ras, Pew, and IBD were pretty accurate:


http://www.pollingreport.com/2004.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I think we can discredit IBD this election cycle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I Agree
They sucked in 00...They tightened at the end to avoid looking ridiculous...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. Who cares? 538 weights all of them based on their historical accuracy...
So 538's numbers already have that built-in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Are you DU's 538 whore?
note: whore not used in a sexist manner at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Nope, I'm a mathematician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Can I use this exchange in a screen play?
Are you a whore?

No, I'm a mathematician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. :) I thought it was pretty funny too. Rock on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. LOL
:rofl:

Yep, you don't hear that too often :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Essene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. historical accuracy is not only a distraction... but shows the problem with pollsters
Edited on Fri Oct-24-08 10:27 AM by Essene
Any serious survey that tries to not only make a descriptive map of national attitudes, but tries to predict a national election outcome... has to make some very big assumptions about voter turn-out.

That's why there's such a fuss about all the "likely voter" polls and their methodologies. They use past data and some survey questions about "excitement levels" to determine if somebody is likely to vote. Herein lies the catch-22.

:party:

Every election is different and unique... and this one is historic



Applying the same weightings from 1996, 2000, 2004... is inherently problematic. Even if they adjust based on local dynamics in the primaries, they are still making huge assumptions about turn-out among different demographics.

These people can't even agree on something as basic as a "bradley effect," yet we think they can not only accurately predict voter turn-out this november among folks under age 25 but nail their voting patterns within a statistically valid and properly weighted figure?

:)

I'm increasingly of the view that this is going to be a COMPLETE BLOWOUT. I mean... a heart-wrenching global gasp for air... true shock/awe political moment that will be a defining moment of this century. People around the world will be in tears, and not even sure which of the top ten reasons are making them cry.

I think these pollsters realize somethign crazy is going on... and "historical trends" wont help them capture it. hehehe

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerDave921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
12. Investors Business Daily
Also known as IBD. They poll in conjunction with TIPP. I've read that they were the most accurate polling outfit for the 2004 election. NOTE: IBD shows this as a one-point lead with Obama up 45-44. Very strange with other polls showing 10+ lead.

As for another poster, RCP is a good site but it is not a polling outfit. It averages a bunch of differnet polls, but does not do any actual polling itself. But it shows you all the polls out there.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
14. I Heard That
the Fox poll was actually quite close to the final vote.

One can only hope -- they had Obama by 10 a few days ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC