Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Electoral-vote.com: Kerry leading, but Ohio is strongly favoring Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
sidestreamer Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 04:56 AM
Original message
Electoral-vote.com: Kerry leading, but Ohio is strongly favoring Bush
http://www.electoral-vote.com/




If someone else posted this already I apologize for making a dupe, but this seems odd...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheWebHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. well if that isn't a fluke poll
maybe Kerry should throw in the towel on Ohio and concentrate on shoring up PA and stealing Missouri or Florida...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 05:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. I still don't buy the OH poll, especially after the closing in 2000
at the end of the race...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 05:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Zogby also has Bush leading in OH
I don't like it because of the "nobody win's without Ohio" curse. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sidestreamer Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Bah, there's always a first time for that to be broken
If we lose Ohio but pick up Florida, all other states remaining in the same camps in 2000, we win. In fact, if we pick up New Hampshire (which is bound to happen) and then, say, Arkansas, Missouri, Arizona, or Colorado, we won't need either one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. I'm a Ranger fan...
I believe in curses! :)

Fortunately, I can't believe Bush will win Ohio, not after what that State has been through with all the jobs lost. I just can't believe it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Matteau! Matteau! Matteau!

(just thought I'd make you feel better) :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dob Bole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. That's just a rule for Republicans....
Republicans can't win without Ohio. Dems can win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is garbage! States listed as weak Kerry
have the same numbers as strong Kerry ! And any poll that lists CA as "weak Kerry is suspect! And Conn.as weak Kerry? Ridiculous!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sidestreamer Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 05:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Actually, Orange County CA and the eastern interior is very Republican
even though the coastal areas (except for San Diego, which is a mixed bag) is as Democratic as it gets. Also, "weak" is when you're leading by 5-10 percent, and according to this poll Kerry has California by 8. I'm not sure about CT though, and finding a Republican north of Cherry Hill isn't easy in New Jersey. Could be that post-convention fluff over there. As I said though, OH's polling is the odd one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 05:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. that maybe the state "they steal" with computers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. Interesting map, though: Three "fingers" of blue sanity, enclosing two...
broad expanses of red ignorance.

I speak directly of the map, of course, and mean no offense to good Democrats within the red states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazzleCat Donating Member (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 05:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Here is a run down of all polls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hadrons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
9. I think the fundies registered a lot of new voters in Ohio ....
its really amazing to see most of Ohio lick the hand that whips it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmbo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
11. Don't you believe it...Ohio is a tossup!
Per Columbus Dispatch Poll...And we've suffered two major plant closings in the last week...one in Columbus, and another in Ashtabula.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
12. That's seems a little strange
I know that where I live (Cleveland) it is pretty liberal, and I see a lot more support of Kerry. I have heard people from southern Ohio, who tend to be more to the right, that are supporting Kerry. Even in Cincinnati there seems to be a lot of Kerry supporters.
It just seems to be a little bit of a stretch to say Ohio is strongly bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LimpingLib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
14. Kerry and Edwards at first were able to portray solid economic differences
Ohio has some of the most unemployed towns in the nation like Youngstown.

Problem is the economic policys of Edwards never matched the rhetoric that made him so promising.


That is the root of the problem.That is THE PROBLEM.

(and the Youngstown Democratic mayor endorced Bush)

That said , I still think there are too many Bush states teetering on the edge of going Kerry. The election was and is Kerrys to loose. Bush can loose Nevada and still win a 269-269 tie but Missouri , Florida , and Colorado are also tied.

Bush can loose Colordao (odds are 50.5% that he will take it though) and perhaps make up for it by taking Wisconsin (another opening the Edwards selection gave to Bush). Missouri is a state Bush can hold (again thanks to the Edwards selection)and Ill predict he will win it very narrowly.

That still leaves Florida for Bush to hold.

I just dont see us handing him what he needs but we have done a good job giving him an outside shot.

But once we get the "final solution" (ousting Bush) then the question becomes "then what" . What foreign and domestic policys will follow our obsessive cleansing of the white house and installing Bush's opponent? Thats what my eye is on:policys. I have a real bad feeling our "then what" is about as well thought out as Hitlers (not that Im comparing the 2 at all , apples and oranges for certain)plan once the world was only left with blone haired people. Left with the same problems of the world and no higher quality of people to solve them. Though in poor tastes to mention Hitler , its a fair comparison as all I seem to hear (and ultimatly discuss myself so Im just as guilty)on left leaning blogs and discussion sites is the obsession to get rid of Bush , and hardly any issue examinations, literaly NONE.

Regardless , hopefully the population will see the wisdom in voting "against Bush" because they sure dont seem to see anything compelling them to vote for Kerry and Edwards. Frankly Ive noticed Edwards sounds even smug and yaking lately the few times I have listned to him for some minutes. I do look forward to his debating Chenny. One will come out looking real bad, it wont be a wash. Im beginning to think it might actualy be Edwards.

I used to talk about polls endlessly now I cant help but be fatigued at the endless poll discussion. I cared about polls because it had canidates that promised some real issue differences as the context ( at times anyway). Now I think Im just out of my league and worrying about the 6 figure $$$ salary, egotistical, chess board staring, overpaid , out of touch , pollsters game and not MY GAME which is no game but actual policys.

From now on , I pray we obsess over issues first as thats what is supposed to come before elections. Now its all "elections firt" then worry about "issues later".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
16. That map is scary.
All of the undecided states are Bush states. If Kerry takes Nevada, he is one point short. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
18. This Map Is Like Jello
Anyone whose been following knows how this map has gone from overwhelming Kerry two weeks ago to what you're seeing now. Actually this is better than a couple days ago...with the skewed Gallup and Strategic Vision polls.

Today's http://www.realclearpolitics.com/bush_vs_kerry_sbys.html realclear politics numbers show a mixed bag as well.

Ohio...Kerry has lost ground, but I hope that only makes Ohio DU'ers work even harder. I suspect we're seeing a lot of reaction from the southern rural areas. In a good sign, W. Va. that was solid * in the last poll is slipping in our direction.

I see NJ is chafing from the McGreevy stuff and Tennesee has swung solid Bunnypants, but the rest of the map looks pretty good. I don't see a Bunnypants lead in any of the Gore 2000 states and I think the corner is turned...the * peak has been reached and it's all downhill from here.

Real promising are the leads I see now in Oregon, New Mexico & New Hampshire...and I suspect we'll see Wisconsin, Iowa & Minnesota stay solid blue in the near future. For Democrats, this race is boiling down to taking either Ohio, Missouri, Florida (yep, we can do it, kids) and/or Tennessee...any of these states and Bunnypants goes packing. Meanwhile, the regime has to make up for the loss of New Hampshire & Nevada and spread resources in states like Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee, Arizona & Colorado...places that weren't on the Rove map 6 months ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clinton Crusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
19. Ohio is downright bizarre
ALL I see and hear is people losing their homes, losing everything, on food lines, destitute, and now it's strong *????

Bizarro World.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC