Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Your gut feeling as of today on EV's

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 02:03 PM
Original message
Poll question: Your gut feeling as of today on EV's
Edited on Sun Nov-02-08 02:06 PM by OmahaBlueDog
I note that the RCP count dropped to 291 today. I'm still sticking with 306.

I'll bet all the Kerry states and OH, VA, IA, NM, and CO

If you answer the survey, please weigh in with your guess on battleground states.

I'd also be curious, regardless of what you think the final EV count is, to learn your answer to the number of EVs that it would take for Obama to claim a mandate -- a sign that the American people want fundamental change, not merely a new executive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
abumbyanyothername Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not sure what you are calling a battleground but
VA, NC, GA, FL, PA, OH, IN, MO, CO, NM, NV, AZ.

Essentially, I am putting more stock in the +17% line in the polls labeled "Already Voted" than in the rest of the polling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. The worst case scenario is Obama 291
Edited on Sun Nov-02-08 02:15 PM by goodgd_yall
Which is still a big win! I think it will be Obama 294 to McCain 244. I don't know what is still considered a battleground state, but I think Obama will get North Dakota. McCain will get Florida, Missouri, Indiana, Montana,Georgia, North Carolina, and Ohio. Obama will win Virginia, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Colorado. As for a mandate, I think that depends more on the popular vote than the EV results. I think something like 56% for Obama would be a mandate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. I think that may be why RCP dropped Ohio into "toss up"
Essentially, 291 is "their final answer"

We've pretty much seen that 291 as the Worst Case Scenario for weeks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. I actually think McCain will take Ohio
There are still quite a few "undecideds" there and I'm going to guess most of them will vote for McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. The RCP average is O 44.8 M 44.6
Even if undecided break 4-1 for McSame, Obama would win

OTOH, Mason Dixon has McSame up 2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
39. I meant O 48.8. It's too late to edit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
43. That's the meme that the repubs and media are pushing..
I'm not buying it. I bet as many stay home or ultimately vote Obama as break for McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shoelace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. weird, latest poll has Obama up by 6 in Ohio (52-46)
take heart, read this from Columbus Dispatch:

The winner of the last Dispatch Poll before a presidential election has carried the state every time in modern Ohio history, although the final survey was a dead heat four years ago between Sen. John Kerry and President Bush, who won by 2.1 percentage points.

If Obama's lead of 52 percent to 46 percent in the new poll holds, he would become the first Democrat to win more than 50 percent of the Ohio vote since Lyndon B. Johnson did in 1964.

The survey shows he has sprinted to a 14-point lead among those who already have cast a ballot under Ohio's new early-voting law, and he is up by a ratio of almost 3-to-1 with voters who registered for the first time this year. Such voters now make up about 10 percent of the electorate.



http://www.dispatchpolitics.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2008/11/02/copy/POLL02.ART_ART_11-02-08_A1_93BOK6G.html?adsec=politics&sid=101
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. I'm not worried about Ohio
Because Obama doesn't need it to win. Also, I think the old axiom about the winner always winning Ohio will be turned on its head this time. This is an unusual election and old patterns will be broken. We have an African-American who has motivated Af-Am to vote like in no other presidential election and we have the Republican party at a very low approval rating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shoelace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. agreed, and Republican "enthusiasm" is at an all time low
heh, I wonder why, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. I had the worst at 273
Which is Kerry + IA, CO, and NM.

My best is 391.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. 331-350 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schulzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm going to stick with 364.
Perhaps I'm too optimtistic about 1-2 states, but I don't care if I'm wrong - when Obama is elected president ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChimpersMcSmirkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. 311. We win Kerry plus VA, OH, NV, CO, IA, NM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wanting to be on the "conservative" side
I'm betting somewhere between high 200's (270+) and low 300's. While it appears to be possible for Obama to have a complete "blowout", I think that the more likely scenario, accounting for electoral shenanigans, possibly lower-than-expected youth turnout, and the massive amount of smearing that Obama has received, is that he will win comfortably but probably without a massive landslide. I do NOT think it will be close and I think he will win by a wide enough margin that it will be difficult for McCain et. al to demand a recount/challenge the results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. I think Obama already has at least 291.
Edited on Sun Nov-02-08 02:28 PM by goodgd_yall
I'm tending conservative too. Of the 291 it seems he pretty much has, I'm giving McCain all the other undecided states (as shown on www.pollster.com) except for North Dakota. That would result in 294 for Obama. Oh, and I'm giving Ohio to McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. What's up with NoDak?
Ed Schultz? The proximity to Canadian healthcare? What is causing that state (and Montana) to drift Blue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. It's a mystery
I'm really pretty astonished by it. It's not like N. Dakota has had a big influx of people from blue states (that I know of).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. I was looking at CNN's map on Friday night
Obama could lose ALL of the current "toss ups" AND even Pennsylvania and still win in a
"squeaker" 270-268. For that to happen, however, I think that the polls would've had to tighten (in reality not fantasy-land) considerably within this last week and, despite some crap polls, it did not appear to happen. I don't honestly think it's going to be THAT close however. Some of those "toss ups" states are undoubtedly going to fall to Obama and I DOUBT that Pennsylvania will go to McCain/Palin so I believe that he will at least get 270+.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
30. I find what I'm seeing in the polls comforting
There's no way Obama can lose unless there is election fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
That Is Quite Enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm cynical and imagining a squeaker. 270-280. As for mandates...
I believe the Republicans and media will set the bar ridiculously high by claiming anything less than 400+ EVs isn't a mandate so that Obama will have no way of coming close to *their* expectations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. Well, a win is still a win
If Bush can claim a 2% "mandate" in 2004 and even a 0% popular "mandate" in 2000, then Obama can claim a whatever percentage win (whatever it may end up being) as a "mandate" as well and I sincerely hope that nobody fails to mention that to the corporate media whores when they inevitably bring it up.

It's become increasingly obvious over the course of this election that the corporate media whores in concert with the Repugs will continue to bait and hound Obama/Biden and the Democratic Congress and it will be incumbent on each and every one of us to continue to organize and push back against them if we are to move forward with bringing much needed CHANGE about in this country. Otherwise, there is the good possibility of some kind of orchestrated Repug resurgence in 2-4 years that will seek to drag the country backwards like they did once after the 1994 mid-term elections and then again after 2000. I believe that we MUST look at an Obama/Democratic victory as "the beginning of the end" and not the END.

I think Obama "gets it" and won't rest on his laurels but he and Biden are going to need each and every one of us just as much as he has during this GE period. He and Biden and even a Democratic Congress (that will still have a modest number of Repugs, "Blue Dogs", and LOSERMAN) won't be able to do it alone and they shouldn't have to. We've ponied up with our donations and votes but to achieve success we must NOT let our guard down and continue to work to achieve the kind of change that Obama has inspired us all to believe in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
That Is Quite Enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
45. I totally agree.
All of our roles will continue on after the election. As Obama has said before, he's looking to let citizens actually participate (in a greater capacity than now) in their government again. That means we'll have to be there, telling our thoughts and plans.

And as far as mandates go, it doesn't really matter to me. Like you said - a win is a win. I don't care how much he wins by, as long as we can make it happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. Awful histogram. The buckets are different sizes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Had I more buckets, I'd have done it differently
...and this ain't scientific or being done for a poli-sci grade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darian Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. 381 - 396
Kerry + IO, NM, CO, NV, MT, ND, MO, IN, OH, VA, NC, FL. Maybe GA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
19. RCP = Obama 353 with no "tossup" states. IRL election all states count; there are no "tossups."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
22. AP: Obama on track for Electoral College win (286 EVs)
WASHINGTON - Barack Obama has pulled ahead in enough states to win the 270 electoral votes he needs to gain the White House — and with states to spare — according to an Associated Press analysis that shows he is now moving beyond typical Democratic territory to challenge John McCain on historically GOP turf.

Even if McCain sweeps the six states that are too close to call, he still seemingly won't have enough votes to prevail, according to the analysis, which is based on polls, the candidates' TV spending patterns and interviews with Democratic and Republican strategists. McCain does have a path to victory but it's a steep climb: He needs a sudden shift in voter sentiment that gives him all six toss-up states plus one or two others that now lean toward Obama.

Obama has 23 states and the District of Columbia, offering 286 votes, in his column or leaning his way, while Republican McCain has 21 states with 163 votes. A half dozen offering 89 votes — Florida, Indiana, Missouri, North Carolina, Nevada and Ohio — remain up for grabs. President Bush won all six in 2004, and they are where the race is primarily being contested in the homestretch.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27488202/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
23. Here's my map (from 270towin.com) - 333:


Less optimistic scenario has us losing FL and being around 300ish.

More optimistic has us winning some portion of IN, OH, MO and/or GA to put us closer to 400 EVs.

IA, CO, and NM really have put the pressure on McCain though. He really HAS to win PA or it's over for him, if we hold there, and we will, it's over. We don't even have to win VA, NC, GA, IN, OH, FL, MO or NV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unbowed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
25. I'll go with the 291 plus VA & FL for 339.
FL would be a great payback for 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
26. I'm going to be extremely conservative and say..
270-280.

Anything more will be icing on the cake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ObamaKerryDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
28. I voted 291-300..
Simply because I'd rather lowball expectations (better for my nerves, lol) and so I can feel all giddily shocked if he exceeds that..:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike 03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
29. I think Obama takes VA, IA, NM, CO. Naturally, I'd love to see OH
and especially FLA in the bag.

I don't even think we need to sweat NM, nor CO for that matter.

And my secret obsession, as a resident of AZ, is see it as close as humanly possible, maybe even turn blue, finally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
31. 375.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tpi10d Donating Member (291 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
32. IA, VA, CO, NM, OH, PA NV, to Obama. FL, NC 50-50
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmerspixelated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
33. Obama will take VA,FL, CO and OH.
AT LEAST! FL will be close, GA, too. But the rest will be in the bag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
34. We got this, in spite of the HATE by McCain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
35. No less than 320
Edited on Sun Nov-02-08 05:44 PM by Sebastian Doyle
And that includes the possibility of Florida being stolen (because that's 27 chickens I won't count until they're hatched, plucked, and fried)

If it's anything under that, not only has it been partially stolen, but we're gonna have to hear horseshit about ACORN and other right wing myths for the next 8 years, as opposed to any real discussion of the ACTUAL theft that took place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
36. 399
Kerry states plus: Nevada, New Mexico, Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Iowa, Missouri, Indiana, Ohio, Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia, and Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
37. Who said less than 269? I want them to come forward for an ass kicking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Whoever answered < 269, let's hear your scenario.
Lurking Freepers?

Election Theft Fear?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
40. 320 to 350
Edited on Sun Nov-02-08 07:15 PM by musicblind
I'm giving Indiana, Missouri, North Dakota, and possibly Florida to McCain... ever other swing/battle state to Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressiveforever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
41. 291--what you said minus Ohio but adding Nevada
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
42. If McCain gets 200, it will have been an unexpectedly good day for him..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
44. WHO THE FUCK SAID LESS THAN 269?? I'M GONNA GET SKITTLES IN HERE TO KICK YOUR ASS!!!
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
46. Not expecting FL, OH, NC or MO
but we won't need them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chichiri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
47. 338
I'm predicting Kerry states + IA, NV, CO, NM, VA, OH, FL.

I'm a pessimist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC