Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Karma's a really nasty thing, or, do we stick it to them with their own cheats?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 06:27 PM
Original message
Karma's a really nasty thing, or, do we stick it to them with their own cheats?
Edited on Wed Nov-12-08 06:29 PM by blondeatlast
Unitary executie powers, the "nuclear" option, etc. all those dirty little cheats they thought would never come back to haunt them.

Now the republicans are facing the very real possibility they will be used to overcome some of the damage GWB wrought.

Should we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
baby_mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm really torn about this.

Some of them are just plain wrong and shouldn't be used but OH MY GOD you could so much genuinely useful stuff done...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Exactly. wouldn't it be kind of cool if Obama overturned the worst of GWB's unitary orders--
then used a unitary order to declare that there would no longer be unitary orders?

It's truly a tough call here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. There's no way around this point: Congress needs guts.
Obama can certainly overturn any or all of *'s Executive Orders. Overturning them all would probably save time, but I believe the new president will proceed in his usual unhesitating, deliberate way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Good point. I think with a smallish majority and a Democrat in the WH, it will find some.
No worries over signing statements and vetoes will help (I hope).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Nuclear option?" If necessary, yes. Unitary executive, no. In fact congress should take that away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC