Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

As for the 16-month goal, Mr. Gates said, “I’m less concerned about that timetable.”

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
gogoplata Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 09:57 PM
Original message
As for the 16-month goal, Mr. Gates said, “I’m less concerned about that timetable.”
“He repeated his desire to try and get our combat forces out within 16 months,” Mr. Gates acknowledged. “But he also said that he wanted to have a responsible drawdown, and he also said that he was prepared to listen to his commanders. So I think that that’s exactly the position a president-elect should be in.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/02/washington/02cnd-gates.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss
Mr. Gates also noted that, since the election, the United States and Iraq have reached a strategic-and-security accord calling for the complete withdrawal of American forces within three years. As for the 16-month goal, Mr. Gates said, “I’m less concerned about that timetable.”

Mr. Gates emphasized that despite his status as the first defense secretary to be asked to stay on by a successor to the president who appointed him — Republican and Democrat alike — he had no intention of being a “caretaker.”

“Our challenges, from the budget to acquisition and procurement reform, war strategy, care of wounded warriors, meeting the needs of war-fighters, decisions on important modernization and capitalization projects and more, all demand the personal attention of the secretary of defense,” Mr. Gates said, “and they will get it.”

Mr. Gates left open the possibility that his stay at the Pentagon might be longer than expected, given his holdover status. “The president-elect and I agreed that this would be open-ended, and so there is no time frame,” Mr. Gates said.

Questions about possible friction between Mr. Gates and Mr. Obama over the timing of a troop withdrawals from Iraq were all but inevitable, since President Bush — who replaced Donald H. Rumsfeld with Mr. Gates as defense secretary two years ago — argued consistently against setting strict timetables.

Mr. Gates said he would not have minded leaving the Pentagon, but “with the country fighting two wars and our men and women in uniform at risk, if a president asks me to help, there’s no way I can say no.”


Sounds kind of open ended to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gates is saying that it is not his job to be "concerned" with the 16 months timetable......
Edited on Tue Dec-02-08 10:08 PM by FrenchieCat
that's not Obama saying this. Obama reiterated that the pull out is to happen as quickly as possible, and to that end, Mr. Gates is doing "early" what is required to accomplish just that.

So it appears that Sec. Gates's actions belie his words.

AP-- Gates: Military looks to accelerate Iraq pullout

WASHINGTON - Defense Secretary Robert Gates signaled a willingness Tuesday to forge ahead with two key priorities for the incoming Obama administration: accelerating the U.S. withdrawal from Iraq and shutting down the Guantanamo Bay detention center.

As the only Republican Cabinet member asked to stay on by President-elect Barack Obama, Gates told reporters that military commanders are looking at ways to more quickly pull troops out of Iraq in light of the 16-month timetable that was a centerpiece of the Democrat's campaign.

He also said it will be a high priority to work with the new Congress on legislation that will enable the U.S. to close the detention center at the U.S. naval base in Cuba, where about 250 terrorism suspects are still being held.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28022197
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. I heard his Presser today. And I think we're going to all eventually be glad he stayed
He sounded like he was going to push Obama's agenda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC