|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
GarbagemanLB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-02-08 10:38 PM Original message |
Something I have been thinking about for a while: The Nuclear Option. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clovis Sangrail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-02-08 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
1. I was against it when Frist et al were behind it and would still be against it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-02-08 10:43 PM Response to Original message |
2. The "nuclear option" was very narrow and only applied to judicial appointments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoyGBiv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-02-08 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
3. I've been thinking the same ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-02-08 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
4. I still oppose it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-02-08 11:03 PM Response to Original message |
5. If they don't act right, then by all means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-02-08 11:04 PM Response to Original message |
6. Why worry? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-02-08 11:35 PM Response to Original message |
7. That would call for Presidential Bully Pulpit action...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loyalsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-03-08 07:48 AM Response to Original message |
8. In this case wrong is wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stahbrett (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-03-08 09:08 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Why would modifying a Senate rule be "antithetical to our form of government"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-03-08 07:50 AM Response to Original message |
9. They should make it clear right away that if the Repukes don't play |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stahbrett (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-03-08 09:04 AM Response to Original message |
10. I've long thought that the filibuster rule should be overhauled |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-03-08 09:12 AM Response to Original message |
12. Filibuster is anti democratic and has long outlived its usefulness. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC