Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RNC to dislose TRUE Palin Clothes bills TODAY....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 08:25 AM
Original message
RNC to dislose TRUE Palin Clothes bills TODAY....
Edited on Thu Dec-04-08 08:25 AM by Laura PackYourBags
http://capitolhillblue.com/node/12516

RNC spent more money on Palin clothes
December 4, 2008 - 7:42am.
(AP Photo)

New campaign reports expected to be filed by the Republican National Committee today will show the Republican National Commitee spent even more money to buy clothes and accessories for controversial vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin.

Previous campaign reports showed the national party spent some $150,000 for clothes for Palen to make the Alaska governor presentable to the American people. The new reports will show additional expenditures over and above the 150 grand.

Palin's use of other people's money to pay for free tips, putting her and her family up in luxury hotels and other extravagant trappings were not only issues during the Presidential campaign but have become issues back in Alaska where additional revelations have shown the governor living large at taxpayer expense.

Reports Edward T. Pound of The National Journal:

The Republican National Committee is scheduled to file a campaign report with the Federal Election Commission Thursday disclosing that the committee spent additional funds to clothe and accessorize vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin.

In October, Politico revealed that the RNC had spent approximately $150,000 on clothing and accessories for Palin and her family after she was selected as Sen. John McCain’s running mate. The story provoked a storm of criticism of the Alaska governor, a mother of five and favorite of the conservative wing of the GOP.

While not providing much in details, Republican officials say that the RNC’s post-election financial report will include information on other “accessories’’ purchased for Palin before the Nov. 4 election.


Meanwhile, The Associated Press reports:

Gov. Sarah Palin has added to her financial disclosure forms two free trips that she took nearly two years ago but failed to report. Palin, who was Republican presidential candidate John McCain's running mate, made the disclosures last month, but after Election Day when she and McCain lost to Barack Obama and Joe Biden. The trips were first revealed in a story by The Associated Press in October.

The free trips were taken in April and May of 2007 and should have been reported within 30 days under state ethics law. The Nov. 17 disclosure forms note that the reports were "not filed timely due to administrative error."

Bill McAllister, the governor's spokesman, said this week that the mistakes were made by travel support staff. He said he could not explain the timing of when and how they were caught, but that it was irrelevant because the error was corrected.

Palin, who has criticized state lawmakers for gifts they take, is not facing any sanctions for the late filings, according to Linda Perez, state administrative director. Perez said she was alerted to the matter by McCain's presidential campaign before the Oct. 14 AP story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Fixed.
...Alaska governor, a mother of five and favorite of the conservative theocratic, KKK-embracing lunatic fringe wing of the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Ah, that's much better!
Certainly more accurate! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. She is nothing but a Bush sized fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. don't see how she'll be re-elected Governor
with all this coming out. Forget running for President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crim son Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. There are polls out there indicating
that she's a favorite for 2012. Just because Obama is P.E. doesn't mean the stupid has left the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. You know her potential primary opponents are already digging up everything they can
Palin was able to dodge a lot of bullets because she wasn't the top of the ticket this time around.

In 2012 she's going to have a big bullseye painted on her and Jindal, Romney and Huckabee are going to be taking aim at hit repeatedly. Furthermore, if she wins the nomination she's not going to be able to avoid the press and given her perpetual road show since November she'd look like a hypocrite if she does the same dodge she did in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. It still amazes me how the Abuse of Power rap never stuck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. Clinton was our favorite by 2008. Nobody else need apply.
She's a "favorite" because the media likes talking about her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crim son Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. That's absolutely true.
Good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarkInCA Donating Member (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Good point, I wish it wasn't true. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crim son Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. I can't get over how repukes who bitch about having to pay
their fair share of taxes, are giving Palin a pass for her grotesque expenditure on CLOTHING. Hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. Greedy lying two-faced. A typical Republic Party official.
And as with George W. bUsh, the rightwingnuttery don't and won't care about how much fraud, how much theft, how many lies or how much damage she'd inflict on us all.

They simply won't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
9. New clothes on a pig...
it's still a pig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
11. Dressing up a maverick is awfully expensive!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
12. If Ted Stevens is doing time for failure to report gifts then why would Palin be different?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Stevens#Indictment

On July 29, 2008 Stevens was indicted by a federal grand jury on seven counts of failing to properly report gifts, a felony, and found guilty at trial three months later (October 27, 2008).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Seriously. Why Phalin gets away with any of this crap is beyond me.
If Biden or Obama did stuff like this on the campaign they would be excruciated but the right wing moans that poor Sarah is being treated in such a sexist way...whatever. As a woman myself she is no role model, just a typical do as I say not as I do rethug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
political_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. The civil war in the GOP is in full swing.
Edited on Thu Dec-04-08 02:16 PM by political_Dem
Sarah has aspirations to make a run for for the White House. And, people can't forget that she is a very polarizing figure in the Republican party--despite her popularity.

With all these relevations coming out, the GOP's "scorched earth policy" against those they are displeased with takes on an entirely new meaning.

If the Alaskans don't take care of her, the GOP will...it seems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. Linda Perez must be a Palin appointee...
Edited on Thu Dec-04-08 02:52 PM by Blue_In_AK
I don't see this as any different than what Ted Stevens got convicted for or what Mark Begich received a fine for from the Alaska Public Offices Commission recently. http://www.adn.com/election/story/541213.html Late disclosure is late disclosure, no matter if it's fixed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC