Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, what ever happened to the spirit of Bi-Partisanship?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:12 PM
Original message
So, what ever happened to the spirit of Bi-Partisanship?
Edited on Wed Dec-10-08 08:57 PM by WCGreen
Republicans, you do know that to be Bi-Partisan is to not attack, attack, attack all the time. In fact, the whole idea of Bi-Partisanship is to extend your hand across the aisle once in a while.

Now if I was president-elect Obama, I would be mighty leary of making anymore non-reciprocated acts of Bi-Partisanship.

Sir, if I may, I would cut them off at their knees and smite them while they are down. It appears you have to beat this elephant in order to make it behave.

And please, Mr. Hannity et al, contrary to what Rush to Judgement might say, being Bi-Partisan dosn't mean you have to fuck a democrat in anyway shape or form. That extends both literally and figuratively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
santamargarita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fuck Bi-Partisanship and fuck the Republicans!
Have you looked around lately at what so called Bi-Partisanship has done to our country?
I'm sorry to come on strong but there is no such thing with this bunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. I suspect the spirit of bi-partisanship is being killed off as we speak.
Seems as though nobody has any use for it. And that's a shame, really...

So many good things could happen if we could just have a little bit of it in our lives.

But then we'd have to trust them...

And that's the tough part.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. The BIG problem with your post

smote
them while they are down

"smote" is past tense

Otherwise, great post!


:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Well, you see, I have a time machine....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. In the future, which is pretty much the same as the past in your case
Edited on Wed Dec-10-08 09:08 PM by ashling
some sort of full disclosure would be - or was - in order

Now, can we go back and clean up that little 2000 misunderstanding ... or at least that war thing?

:rofl:

on edit: Oh, and I need a little extra time on this paper I am writing. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Refuckyoukins are allergic to bipartisanship.
They are always out for themselves. They don't give a shit about America or Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. You don't reach out to the complete looney's
You reach out to the moderates in the spirit of bipartisanship.

There is always going to be the far right who will always oppose everything you do. If you reach out to the John McCain wing of the party, it will marginalize the Sarah Palins, sending the party into more infighting.

The whole time the Democrats enjoy support from the majority of the nation and get the political capital to do whatever they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bi-partisanship is another word used by do nothing members of our party
when it comes to what has happened since 2001.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happychatter Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. we need to reach out to the people that didn't vote at all
nearly half the eligible populace doesn't vote

if queried they will tell you that MONEY and POWER are the only things that matter

...that their vote is meaningless

Prove to them that they are wrong, and the Republican Party can go fuck itself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadowLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. Look on the bright side, the republican's 'bipartisanship' is building them a permanent minority
The more the republicans continue to refuse to compromise on stuff like immigration, the more they screw themselves over in the long run.

Take a look at all of these growing voting blocks, and how the GOP is screwing themselves over with each.

Hispanics: The fastest growing racial minority in America, the GOP is screwing themselves over with them by refusing to vote for any immigration reform that Hispanics could support, and some of the GOP's supporters sound outright racist towards hispanics when they shout stuff when holding antiimmigration signs.

Young voters: It's a no brainer that to stand a fighting chance in 50 years you can't keep on losing the youth vote. Yet the GOP has done things lately like openly attack pop culture and things that young people love, turning it into a war of generations. Sure that may work in the present, but in the long run you're screwing yourself over by doing that. Young voters are much more tolerant towards other persecuted/hated minority groups in America, for example I believe 2/3's of young people (people 30 and under) support gay marriage. While only around 3% of the population is gay, the GOP is screwing themselves over with the young people with their religious right crusades against stuff like gay marriage. Just like religious right people get pissed off at the thought of gays marrying, the GOP also angers those who support gay marriage with that kind of rhetoric about how horrible gay marriage is.

Bush also didn't help with young voters either, as a young 20 something person I knew prosperity under Bill Clinton, and failure and failure after Bush. The worst part for the GOP about young voters is that how someone votes the first few times they do vote is how they'll usually vote for the rest of their lives.

College educated whites who work as professionals: This group is growing because of more people then ever going to college. These white people tend be more liberal then other whites. This group of voters is also growing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doc_Technical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. You don't shake the hand ..
of someone who has slapped your face.
These bullies don't respect "being nice",
to them it is a sign of weakness.
I got your Bi-Partisanship right here!
(while grabbing my crotch)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think you should actually try it but honestly just to bash them over
the heads with later when they refuse to work to do anything constructive, as they always do.

I think its a game that has to be played just to cement the upperhand but the actual real thing is more or less a joke that means in a practical sense that you're trying to vulture a few votes to share the heat or the cover up defections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. Bi-Partisanship doesn't apply to the rethuglicons unless it suits their needs
This is how they play. It has been this way for as long as I can remember.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. Obama will give them one chance with the stimulus package and then its see ya
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
15. The Spirit of Bi-Partisanship exists ONLY to destroy LIBERALS in ...
Edited on Wed Dec-10-08 11:42 PM by ShortnFiery
every potential aspect of representation and or participation in Our Government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
16. I think they need to be coerced...
by 'we the people'. And that ain't going to happen, so ...oh well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
17. Repuke bipartisanship is for Democrats to compromise to what REPUKES want...
without ANY compromises by REPUKES...you should know that by now...

And bipartisanship is ALWAYS desired when Democrats WIN.

You can bet your sweet ass that if and when the repukes are back in charge, they will NEVER mention or even think of "bipartisanship"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC