Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Holy carp, people: SYMBOLS ARE IMPORTANT.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:01 AM
Original message
Holy carp, people: SYMBOLS ARE IMPORTANT.
So there are tons of running around telling folks on this forum how unimportant the Rick Warren thing is, "It's only a few minutes." "It's just a gesture, it doesn't mean anything." Da-da-da-da-da.

When in fact, WHY was Barack Obama's election so important to MILLIONS? Because of the SYMBOL of Obama as the first African-American president. The SYMBOL which meant: "This person is not like all of the ones who came before; he is different, and will bring to the office of the President a new worldview." THAT is why you were crying on election night. Because of the SYMBOL and the deeper meaning you read into it.

And what I'm saying is that the SYMBOL of Warren giving the invocation seems to be giving the deeper meaning of, "This homophobic, misogynist preacher is going to bless the inauguration, and, by extension, the entire administration of this president."

Nice symbol to choose. :eyes: NOT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Exactly. Symbols matter.
Honoring someone symbolically matters. Of course the prayer giver won't be writing laws or heading departments, but he is given a high profile symbolic honor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. The Rick Warren complaining is equivalent to the flag pin garbage.
I don't believe in putting a lot of stock in symbolism.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. You've got some reading to do, then, because human beings think in symbols.
Seriously, I suggest you check out George Lakoff, or google "cognitive linguistics," or maybe even spend some time with Joseph Campbell's "The Power of Myth." Human beings interpret and perceive their world through a symbolic and narrative filter. It's an essential part of our base psyche.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I don't care. "I" don't put stock in symbolism. Other people have and will but I don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Thanks for your support, Pookie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
19. Then, why not invite David Duke or the leader of the Aryan nation?
Surely black folks could just overlook that as a meaningless gesture. And it would be the ultimate in "reaching across the aisle."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. I don't like Warren buts a very out of proportion comparison...
Warren doesn't represent a violent movement, just an ignorant one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. That's wrong
the Christian hate crowd doesn't openly advocate violence, but they enable it. Gay bashers take their attitudes from people like Warren who declare that gays and lesbians are worthy of civic consideration and are somehow less than human.

All the people like Warren, the Catholic bishops, and the leaders of the Mormon Church have blood on their hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. So popular anti-war figures are responsible for other more radical anti-war people becoming violent?
Thats EXACTLY what you just said, based on your logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Wow -- please go take a logic class before embarrassing yourself any more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Don't get smarmy because I spotted flaws in your logic that you are unable to see...
You said, without going into any specific topic, that people who preach a certain ideology peacefully still enable others to become violent under the banner of said ideology.

Thats was exactly the logic behind your statements, there is no getting around it.

I am certainly not nor will I ever be embarassed by anything I have to say around here, EVER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Obama doesn't think that way
does anyone not get it yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Nope, sorry, I don't get it.
Please provide concrete example of what you mean by "Obama doesn't think that way" because that statement means nothing to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. an example from your OP
"This homophobic, misogynist preacher is going to bless the inauguration, and, by extension, the entire administration of this president."

You haven't heard Obama saying anything like this about anyone, and you won't.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. But yet he gave this guy a stamp of approval -- why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. politics
lots of people like Warren. Voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. Obama is the one who said words matter.
Just words?

Remember that?

I think you're mistaken about how he thinks or claims to think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. I agree. I can't agree with Obama on this call.
This comes under the heading of chosen symbol, and in my view, Obama has chosen badly, truly disappointingly. Yuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
9. Except that if there wasn't all this hysteria...
hardly anyone would know much about Warren, or even know he's speaking.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. exactly. Now Warren is front page news! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. Silence = Death
We learned that a long time ago. Ignoring hate will not make it go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
12. What about Barack Obama being associated with Bill Ayers?
That was a terrible symbol, being with a unrepentant terrorist.

This whole thing is stupid.

It is a 2 minute prayer which has no consequences to the nation whatsoever. Lets worry about Obama's actual accomplishments in office, not these empty gestures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. that by definition is not a symbol.
an inauguration by it's very nature is a symbolic event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
13. Is the symbol of Rick Warren more important or less important than the symbol of Dr. Lowery?
Because it looks to me like pretty much a wash.

confusedly,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
14. Thank you. K & R. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
18. symbols are important. but that doesn't make them substance.
and i think that there have already been actual appointments to administration posts that are of substance. some people here are feeling that distinction.
and some people here are seeing cabinet picks slimed completely, without substance, based on similar symbols.
i thought we were the smart guys, capable of complex thought. guess not.
guess the community i thought i had was a mirage, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
21. Misogynist?
Not arguing he's homophobic but misogynist is a new one on me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. VERY much so -- he believes women should subjugate themselves totally to their husbands
And females can have NO leadership role at all. Also, he's anti-choice -- no abortions in ANY CASE. EVER.

He's also anti Science (Evolution, etc.).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Yeeeech
Y'know, I'm not Christian but I have read the Bible and I'd like to know when exactly Jesus's teachings about compassion and tolerance became wedded to this passal of extreme-right views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. I agree 100% -- and I'm not Xian either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC