Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Obama let colleges keep treating most faculty like Walmart workers?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 03:09 PM
Original message
Will Obama let colleges keep treating most faculty like Walmart workers?


The Huffington Post ran a good article on how colleges and universities abuse most of their faculty by having two separate and unequal classes: one paid far less per class to do the same job and usually given no job security or health benefits.

The best part of the article is the bit when she asks administrators if they aren't ashamed of doing this (which I have included at the end). I asked the same thing on the discussion board at The Chronicle of Higher Education, and administrators actually said it was our own fault because adjuncts are stupid enough to take the jobs.

KEY EXCERPTS:


Gina Nahai
Posted December 14, 2008 | 09:30 PM (EST)

The Great Shame of America's Colleges

You think Wal-Mart employees are exploited?

What if I told you that all over this country, major institutions created and sustained with a mission to pursue the betterment of mankind, colleges and universities that sit on billion dollar endowments are using the current economic crisis to further enrich themselves at the expense of the meager livelihood of long-time faculty? That at the same time as they claim to be the guardians of knowledge and the champions of the arts, they treat their faculty to the legal and financial equivalent of what migrant day laborers earn by standing outside Home Depot?

Freeway Flyers: aka "adjunct professors", aka "teaching professionals." They're the dirty little secret of universities and colleges all around the United States. They're the PhDs with decades of teaching experience, award-winning artists, published authors whose names and reputations draw students to the universities, whose work justifies the $50,000/year tuition, raises the million-dollar donations, earns the sought after rankings in USA Today's annual poll.

In exchange for all that, they are hired only on a part-time basis, made to sign a pledge that they will not work more than twenty hours a week and will not--not now, not ever--have a claim to health or retirement or any other kind of benefits, not even a parking pass. That they are "at will" employees who can be let go at any time, for any reason. Their salaries are so meager, they have to teach two, three, sometimes five classes a semester, at five different universities, just to pay their rent. That's why they're called Freeway Flyers. One writer I knew taught for twenty years at a Southern California college with more money than the GNP of a small country. He was paid so little, he had to supplement his income by working the graveyard shift at airport gift shops. He was the author of one of the biggest literary novels of the 20th century; when he died, his family couldn't afford to bury him. Another guy--a teacher of mine from the days when I was a student of writing--drove four hours each way to teach the same class for twenty-seven years. He made something near $3,000 a semester. He was recently let go because the school could take advantage of the rising unemployment rates to hire a younger person for less than $3,000.
***

Aren't the heads of these colleges ashamed of the exploitation? Wouldn't they want to do the right thing even if they don't have to?

I've asked many of them these questions, especially recently. One of them was a former peace corps volunteer. Their answers are short and scripted: "Of course we want to do the right thing; but only when possible." His colleague, another dean, lamented openly the fact that out of every professor on their payroll, there was one who could not be let go or forced to work for half her usual salary because that one, unfortunately, had a contract. Not that anyone's unhappy with the professor's work, mind you. They just don't like paying more than they have to.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gina-nahai/the-great-shame-of-americ_b_150940.html">FULL TEXT


Even during the darkest days of the Bush administration, higher education was an island of reasoned debate and progressive dissent. This apartheid faculty system, with a small minority given decent pay and job security, and the rest exploited and abused, is part of the right's decades long effort to crush any sources of opposition. As Karl Rove said:

As people do better, they start voting like Republicans --- unless they have too much education and vote Democratic, which proves there can be too much of a good thing.
(from http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Karl_Rove">The New Yorker, Feb. 6, 2001)


Anything that threatens Karl Rove and his kindred spirits in the GOP should be protected and rewarded.

If you think this abuse of faculty is something that should change, http://change.gov/page/s/education">tell the incoming Obama administration.

For more information, see the http://equalpayforequalwork.blogspot.com/">Equal Pay for Equal Work blog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. why shouldn't employment protections be equivalent
no matter what job a person is holding.

Instead of asking is it okay to treat faculty like Walmart employees....isn't the point really that its wrong how Walmart employees are treated?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. yes, but they are a yardstick everyone understands
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. School districts do this to some teachers as well.
Edited on Thu Dec-18-08 03:14 PM by GreenPartyVoter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. K-12? That could be a disturbing trend. Some faculty who need benefits switch to high school
It's kind of Sophie's choice: do you take the job with the freedom to teach the way you think best but can't support a family or do you take the job that can support a family but is micromanaged by right wing testing-mania and scripted curriculum?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't think the federal government has much oversite of private & state universities
Help me here: how many colleges are run by the federal government? I can only think of three: West Point, Anapolis, and the Air Force Academy at Colorado Springs.

What's the employment situation like at those places?

Anyway, I don't think Obama will be in much of a position to rewrite the laws of supply and demand. TAs make dirt wages because there's a lot of suppliers of that particular labor skill and so few purchasers in that labor market as to constitute a monopsony. Wages will be low.

Probably some labor action would be the best way to get fair wages in that industry. I certainly hope Obama's Labor Dept. supports any such efforts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. nearly all colleges get money from the federal government, so strings can be attached
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC