Will the Warren pick cause some named appointee to backout. Now is the

CK_John

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Dec-18-08 09:31 PM
Original message

Will the Warren pick cause some named appointee to backout. Now is the

time for them to voice their opinions or we can assume they are in full agreement with Obama's decision.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

LoZoccolo

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Dec-18-08 09:32 PM
Response to Original message

1. Lame. n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

EFerrari

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Dec-18-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message

2. I don't think we've seen all the fallout yet. n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Joe the Revelator

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Dec-18-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message

3. Another case in point.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Dennis Donovan

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Dec-18-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message

4. Probably not...

Despite my vehement oppostion to the inclusion of Warren in the Inauguration, I still hope that President-Elect Obama can do the work that we elected him for - that includes those he's tapped to help him in this Herculian task.:thumbsup:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Uzybone

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Dec-18-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message

5. LOL

Dream on. This is only a HUGE firestorm on some pockets on the net. No one will give up a chance to serve because of a 2 minute prayer.

This was a bad choice ...Ill say it again and again. But in the grand scheme of things it'll be meaningless. Book it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Dennis Donovan

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Dec-18-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #5

6. No, it's not...

This is reverberating more than any other thing associated with Obama since the election.

I'm straight, white and a male. Warren offends me to the bone.:thumbsdown:

This is a CIVIL RIGHTS issue. Would you have accepted the inclusion of George Lincoln Rockwell at LBJ's inaugural?:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

yellowcanine

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Dec-18-08 09:47 PM
Response to Original message

7. "Warren Pick"????? You make it sound like Warren received an important appointment.

Guess what? He didn't. Mountain, meet molehill. Shit I am getting sick of all the stupid bitching about inconsequential matters. The man is going to deliver an invocation. That's it. Christ almighty, one would think he had been named to the cabinet or something.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Sat May 04th 2024, 04:39 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.