Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did any of those who are so worked up over Caroline Kennedy's "lack of experience" raise similar

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:05 PM
Original message
Did any of those who are so worked up over Caroline Kennedy's "lack of experience" raise similar
concerns about Al Franken?

If not, why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. People are free to elect who they want
What the hell is it about democracy that so many people on this board just refuse to grasp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bravehammer Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. She's not running for election.
Apparently she's not all that big on elections anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm not involved in this whole debate BUT Al Franken went through an actual election
Edited on Fri Dec-19-08 12:08 PM by cryingshame
and is in the process of proving he can win one (an election).

edit- Caroline Kennedy (like Hillary Clinton) is qualified for the position but not the MOST qualified.

And it's open to debate that she'd be able to win re-election should she be seated in interim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. If today's results stand, then Franken was ELECTED by the people of Minnesota. Same with Obama.
Edited on Fri Dec-19-08 12:07 PM by GarbagemanLB
Kennedy would be appointed.

There are many more qualified candidates, I am sure, who want that NY seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. There are probably plenty of candidates more qualified than Franken - on paper
But the voters decided that, despite his sparse political background, they want him to represent them in the Senate. Obviously "qualifications" go beyond traditional political experience.

I don't think it matters whether someone is elected or appointed. The bottom line is that SOMEONE is going to be APPOINTED to this position. No one is going to be elected to it before 2010.

I just don't understand all of Caroline-hating. If she's appointed and doesn't do a good job, the voters can elect someone else to the seat in 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. The appointment, rather than an election, of a Senator is patently undemocratic.
It hearkens back to the time when Senators were appointed by state legislatures.

But that is the law in NY. Paterson should not put Kennedy on top of the list, since she has no experience. She can run for Senator is she likes, and then the test is whether voters will vote for her. But she shouldn't be given the post because of her name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. But the brouhaha has been over Kennedy
not the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. because Al Franken put himself up in front of the voters.
that's the frickin' point. Caroline is lobbying one person for the job using her name as leverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. yes, cali, but...
In New York, there is not an election. If Kennedy is appointed, she'll have to run for that seat in 2012.

Not that it really matters to me. I'm more concerned with getting the nutcases out of Georgia than the NY senate race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. She'll also have to run for the seat in 2009/2010 - whenever NY has the next statewide elecion
Because Hillary's seat doesn't expire until 2012 the person appointed will have to run a special election AND then run again in 2012. So that's a minimum of 2 races, possibly 4 if there is primary competition in 4 years or less in a state that's gonna cost about $30mil an election.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. silly! Franken layed in bed with Arriana!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. Caroline spent four summers interning in the US Senate for her uncle.
If that isn't Senate experience, what is? I think this is just a bullshit argument pushed by the corporate press, which is always, always going to be anti-Kennedy, the same way it was anti-Kerry. I hope to heck Paterson doesn't crack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC