Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Burris will be seated...I see no way around it...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 05:44 PM
Original message
Burris will be seated...I see no way around it...
Blago is still Governor and can legally make the appointment. The IL SoS role in this is ministerial, meaning he has no choice but to certify someone legally appointed. And the Senate cannot constitutionally deny him the seat....

They could try and expel him after he was seated but there is no way Repubs will go along with that...

Best Dems can do is deny him membership in the caucus and refuse to give him any committee assignments...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why hold it against Burris - that's just childish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I disagree...
Edited on Tue Dec-30-08 05:50 PM by S_E_Fudd
Its not personal...but Blago cannot be allowed to get away with this type of corruption.

I think the caucus should deny Burris access to the caucus or committee assignments until Blago resigns...once he does then Burris can be admitted to the caucus

That should be the price for seating him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The Dems lost this tactical round - they could have scheduled a special election...
imo they should be glad they got a Dem, and an AA at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. why and risk losing the seat to a repuke?
In that political climate there, why the heck would you want a special election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. That's why they didn't go with a special election - but they now have...
...a decent Dem for the seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Appointed by a corrupt Governor...
It is the acceptance of corruption that got the repubs kicked out in 2006. Dems should not do the same thing. Blago may or may not be legally responsible for what he did...but there is absolutely no doubt he is politically corrupt...more than enough grounds for the Senate to take action...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Blago does not equal Burris.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. The apponitment is tainted by scandal...
That is a fact...why Burris chose to accept under this cloud is beyond me...but it cannot stand...Dems need to show they will not put up with it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Sorry, I don't think Blago's situation has anything to do with Burris.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Thats Burris fault. He shouldn't have taken it, if he wasn't willing to be attached at the hip
with Blago. He's a very smart man, he knew what he was getting into. I can't believe he actually found a respectable politician that would stand up there with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Blago outplayed the Dems, within the law. Burris wants to serve...
...and, unless he's guilty of something illegal or unethical, it's fine with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. The process is tainted if Blago appoints someone. Thats the point
People are always going to be wondering if Burris, paid him somehow. The media is already digging up his contributions to Blago. And fundraisers he might have had for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Well, I would bet that NONE of our senators are squeaky clean...
So far Burris looks fine to hold the seat for a couple of years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Oww...my taint!
;(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. I agree...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. The problem is, Blago hasn't been convicted let alone charged
with anything yet. He agreed to have a special election and the legislature declined. So what option does that leave? Blago should have stepped down and allowed the Lt. Gov make the appointment, but he's looking out for himself.

CNN just broke news that Obama released a statement from Hawaii saying he supports the Senate Dems in their opposition to Burris.

Hmmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Uh...Blago has been charged...
Why he had to go to court...

Whether he is legally responsible for what he did will be decided in court...but there is no doubt that he is politically corrupt...and that is more than enough reason for Dems in the Senate to take some kind of action...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
34. Yes, of course. Duh
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It's not holding anything against Burris
Blago could have appointed, I don't know, Kucinich and it would still be unacceptable.

He forfeited his right to appoint someone when he tried to sell the seat.

He needs to resign and Quinn and then appoint Burris if he so desires, but Blagojevich shouldn't be allowed to appoint anyone, no matter how great they may or may not be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Blago has the legal right to appoint, which he did...
It's absurd to hold it against Burris.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
33. I'm not talking about legally
Legal or not, there's no way this should be allowed to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Unfortunately Blago has not been convcted
and he is STILL the legal governor of the state and the SINGLE person with the authority

The US Senate has better things to do that get involved in STATE politics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. It is tolerance of this type of corruption...
That got the Republicans kicked out in 2006...Dems cannot fall into the same trap. Whether Blago is legally responsible for what he did will be decided in court, but there is no doubt at all he is corrupt...that is most definitely an issue the Senate ought to be involved in...

IN my opinion Dems ought to keep him from joining the caucus and refuse to assign him to any committees until Blago leaves office...the sooner he goes the sooner Burris can be admitted to the caucus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. You confuse tolerance for corruption with stating that the FEDERAL
Senate is getting involved in STATE issues. Your SENIOR state senator, absolutely.. he should be involved, but the rest of the US Senate, not really

Oh and by the way precedent is also against the US Senate not seating him... 1966 case.

But right at the moment, all these games, are making ANY prosecution next to impossible... why? Conviction in the court of public opinion, which will make finding an impartial jury of his peers very difficult to find.

This guy is corrupt, but the case does NOT belong in the US Senate, but in the DOJ. And for the moment, the appointment is part of his duties. The State Constitution does not have a place for a special election, but... appointment by the governor.

Remember how the system works
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Absolutely the Senate has a say...
In fact the Senate is the only body that can oust a sitting Senator...states cannot recall their own members...they also get to decide who gets committee assignments. And in fact, this is a national issue whether it should be or not...if Dems let this pass without attempting to do something about it it will taint the entire party...not just those dems in Illinois...

And I venture to guess there isn't a single Democrat in Illinois outside of Blago and Burris who believes this is the right thing to do...

I agree that the Senate will have to seat him (see my OP), but in my opinion they should not admit Burris to the caucus or give him a committee assignment until Blago resigns...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Watch as this builds and becomes a LEGAL hot potato
and the aforementioned 1966 case, which is PRECEDENT... for this.

This is making Blago harder to prosecute as well

The Senate has many ways to skin the cat, but doing what they are doing LEGALLY, will byte them in the ass

Or are you telling me that Burris is paying to play? In that case, absolutely they have a right and a duty to expel him... is he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. As I said...the Senate will have to seat him...
But the dems do not have to let him join the caucus, nor do they have to give him committee assignments..

So I am saying the Senate will have no choice but to seat him...but they don't have to give him any responsibilities..or influence...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. If the investigation of Blago shows that Burris met the price
that Blago wanted for the seat, I think that there would be a way to remove him from office fairly quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Except most of the others probably paid a similar price. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm sorry, but they should investigate Burris now.
Given the taped conversations, Blagojevich is not willing to give the senate seat for nothing.

That looks like probable cause to investigate Burris.

(see why Blagojevich shouldn't be allowed to do this?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bajamary Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. The IL Sec of State won't certify appointment

The IL Sec of State, Jesse White, said he will not certify Blago's appointment.

Jesse White and Roland Burris are both African americans from Chicago but that's about the end of their similarities. Jesse White has a very good reputation while Burris less so.

Furthermore, Roland Burris has personally give $$ to Blago as has his wife and other friends. So the odds of Burris actually becoming the Junior Senator from my state are very, very slim.

Thank God.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. He has to certify a legally appointed person...
He has no choice. If he refuses and goes to court it may take longer, but in the end he will be certified...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. is there any reason burris is a bad choice, why not seat him?
you guys need a senator, why not him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bajamary Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. crook

Another IL crook
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Top Cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
35. Burris should have declined the seat without a vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC