Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Obama cut this deal with the pugs, what would you think?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 09:59 PM
Original message
Poll question: If Obama cut this deal with the pugs, what would you think?
Edited on Fri Jan-16-09 10:05 PM by Ken Burch
"OK, guys, here's the deal. I won't send Dubbikins and Dr. Evil to the Hague, as long as none of my bills or noms get blocked in the Senate".


I'm not sure he'd actually do this...but it's the best explanation I could think of for the reluctance to investigate. I'm also not sure what I'd think of it myself, but at least it might be Machiavellianism put to decent use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. I couldn't live with it.
Every time these kind of thugs have been given a pass "for the good of the country", they come back worse than ever.

If FDR had allowed Prescott Bush and his cohorts to be prosecuted for treason, we might have been free of Bushco forever.

This privileged crowd expects to get away just like their fathers and grandfathers did. I say enough is enough and it's time something was tried to stop them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political_Junkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agreed!
enough is enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. If we applied the laws, they wouldn't have a leg anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Make one of those bills a Truth & Reconcilliation Commission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. reluctance to investigate?
What do you base that assumption on?

His most recent quote I could find:

"We're still evaluating how we're going to approach the whole issue of interrogations, detentions and so forth … we're going to be looking at past practices and I don't believe that anybody is above the law."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Well, all the ambiguity of that quote:
Edited on Fri Jan-16-09 10:18 PM by Ken Burch
I'm still thinking he may investigate, I'm just wondering whether he might have seen something like I suggested in the OP as a political strategy. Given that even with all his "reaching across the aisle", the 'pugs are still committed to all out obstructionism a la the "Southern Democrats" of the early 60's, I can picture Obama contemplating it. I might even defend it if it actually got huge legislative results.

In essence, it could be seen as the Lieberman deal writ very, very large.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. How can you respect this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. How does it help them to protect Bush and Cheney at this point? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Well, the idea would be that anything that kept most of the bodies buried
would help the party. And the 'pugs are good at instantly disassociating themselves with their worst. Remember how, by 1976, they seemed to be able to convince the country that Nixon had never actually been their nominee?

I can picture the 'pugs thinking this might be a good deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. Did the Republikins break the law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why break the law for big buks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. I thought this would be able the selection of the dog. I'm pro-pug. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Actual pugs would, of course, have MUCH higher standards than 'pugs.
Edited on Fri Jan-16-09 11:27 PM by Ken Burch
unlike 'pugs, REAL pugs would never tolerate war criminals in their ranks:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
14. Even if his cabinet picks were all GOOD choices, I could not agree with that.
The Bush Crime Family has gotten away with far too much for far too long. They need to pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
15. Republicans have no loyalty to Bush, Cheney or anyone else....they look out for #1 only
Obama has some silly shit idea he's "healing" the nation when in reality he's just ensuring Bush/Cheney get a free ride. Stupid and harmful to democracy but its Obama's choice and he seems intent on bending over...

Don't look for the Republican goons in congress to play this game. They could give a shit less-Bush/Cheney is old news to them. Fucking Obama is job one now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
16. Anyone who says "I couldn't" has their head so far up their ass
Edited on Sat Jan-17-09 12:34 AM by Occam Bandage
it's extruding from their neck and back up their ass a second time. Four years of the Democrats being able to act with absolute impunity, without any concern for filibusters? My God, the only reason I'd vote "I couldn't" is if I were to fear that the Democrats would pass too many reform bills and they'd face some sort of public backlash, and even that would be worth it a hundred times over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Some people want revenge more than they want progress. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC