Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Day of Service or Day of Self-Service?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 09:41 AM
Original message
Day of Service or Day of Self-Service?
Do we serve others in need today as President Obama has asked us to?

Do we put aside our own personal pet issues in the service of a larger goal?

Do we meet on common ground do feed and clothe the hungry (even if the other side is Homophobic?)

OR do we say "not another dime until I get mine"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. uh oh
this will not go over well. I think people can both register their disappointment and displeasure over what happened with Gene Robinson at the concert and serve others. It's not really an either/or situation. And I think that people do have the right to feel what they feel about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, but it is reflective of the larger issue as well.
For the next few years, we need to find common ground to work together. We need to prioritize the issues and do some serious triage.

Same thing as today. Some here have actually been quite vocal in saying they will not participate or support the President any longer until they get theirs.

So there it is. Serve the larger good or serve yourself. It is a choice that we all need to make every day. Often, very often, to do both at the same time is impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Those that choose the route you describe, are indeed petty
and shortsighted. I can only hope they're a small minority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EraOfResponsibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Well said, Bonobo
Well said. It's time to stop being selfish and thinking of others (and I include myself in that indictment).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. funny that those disappointed about Robinson said NOTHING about the Gay Men's Chorus performing
and they were actually PART of the concert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is America, Human rights are not negotiable, nor are they to be delayed at the behest of
Edited on Mon Jan-19-09 09:50 AM by terisan
an administrator (president) or followers of same.

You best serve others by championing human rights. There is no larger goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. True, but there are goals of equal importance
and I'd say basic access to those things that sustain life are certainly of equal importance. Isn't access to medical care a civil rights issue? How about access to food and housing? Aren't those things as important as marriage equality? If not, why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Dictators around the world use security issues of food, shelter as excuse to suppress human rights
You have every right to shelter and feed yourself and others but not at the expense of the human rights of any individual.


Imagine how many poor people could be fed by what is being served to the rich political donors at the inaugural balls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. uh, hate to break this to you but that dictators around the
world use legitimate issues in nefarious ways hardly discredits the legitimacy or vital importance of those issues. I mean really, that's so obvious that it's sad it has to be pointed out. And do try reading for comprehension- it's an important skill. I never said that civil rights should be sacrificed, but that there are other issues as pressing, and sorry, I do consider hunger and poverty as high a priority as marriage equality.

Oh, and just imagine how many children could be fed by Warren Buffet's millions. The inauguration expenses- largely paid by private sources- are not what keeps us from lifting people out of poverty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. I understand what you're saying and appreciate the sentiment.
I don't think it's entirely appropriate in regards to Robinson. While it's true that many are going off the deep end and true that many get wrapped up in their own desire to pick pointless fights, I think there's room for honest disappointment over the Obama team's handling of the Warren and Robinson issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Steel Donating Member (337 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. Progressives must not allow Obama or anyone else to divert us from our goal.
Day of Service or Day of Self-Service?

Do we serve others in need today as President Obama has asked us to?

Do we put aside our own personal pet issues in the service of a larger goal?

Do we meet on common ground do feed and clothe the hungry (even if the other side is Homophobic?)

OR do we say "not another dime until I get mine"?


Subsidies to the poor and the hungry and all the others who need are the People's business. Allowing the need to be filled by private sources diminishes its impact on the public will. It delays the day when the those who need take their full place in our communities. Progressives must not allow Obama or anyone else to divert us from our goal, a public policy which truly promotes the general welfare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC