Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It looks like the word "Democratic" has been deleted from the Repubs.' vocabulary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:20 PM
Original message
It looks like the word "Democratic" has been deleted from the Repubs.' vocabulary
Edited on Wed Jan-28-09 03:21 PM by jenmito
They just gave a little press avail and every single Repub. called us the "Democrat party" and talked about the "Democrat plan." I wish Obama would say something about it, that if they're truly working with the President to be bi-partisan, they could start by using the proper term for his party. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alwysdrunk Donating Member (908 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. I remember people complaining about this to Bush
Like it was one of his Bushims. They are all doing it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. It started before Bush, but he used it, even in his SOTU speech,
then claimed it was a "slip of the tongue."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. On the one hand, this little game they play is bullshit. OTOH, it is symbolic why they cannot
be trusted and should be marginalized and eliminated as much as possible from all aspects of American society.

That Pres. obama continues to try to work with these cretins is the major mark against him. I just hope he smartens up before too long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, they are hardly "well read", now are they? Book learnin' is for pointy-headed libruls.
Edited on Wed Jan-28-09 03:24 PM by Justitia
They sound really stupid & ignorant when they purposefully fuck up the English language.

Morons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. I noticed that, too...
Maybe the Dems need to start calling them "repuke" instead of republican. :evilgrin:

And the talking heads never correct them when they say "Democrat"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Most of the Talking Heads on the MSM Do It Too
They all have their orders, and are following them to the letter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. I disagree. As a matter of fact, Chris Matthews has called out Repubs. when
they have used that phrase before. Maybe on Faux they use it, but I've never seen THs use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. He let it go twice yesterday when I was watching
Just saying, he hears it and lets it go too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Well, he has corrected someone a few weeks ago as well as a couple months ago.
I didn't hear a Repub. using it yesterday on his show. I DID hear them reading Limbaugh's comments where HE used it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TTUBatfan2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Democrats in Congress...
should start referring to the Republican Party as the Republic Party, since the Republicans want to play this stupid little Limbaugh game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. We need to drop the 'an' or the 'Re'.
They then become the republic party or the publican party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Yeah...
or the RepubliCON party and stress the "con."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
33. It Goes Back To mccarthy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. It was something McCarthy started. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think that leaves them the "Republic" party . . . ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:28 PM
Original message
Wonder what they would say if Obama called them that? LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
41. Notice how little has been made of their "Democrat" routine by media . . .
One or twice commented on --- then taken as normal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Nah, too many letters... just let me cross a few out....
R e p u b l i c a n

There we go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. REPUBLICANISM IS A CANCER
ONE TRACK MINDS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
budkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's a snide way of implying that Democrat != Democratic
Too bad they lost. Deal with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. I wish the president would call them on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madwivoter Donating Member (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. "The 'ic' factor" - interesting article in The New Yorker
From August, 2006...

<snip>

The history of “Democrat Party” is hard to pin down with any precision, though etymologists have traced its use to as far back as the Harding Administration. According to William Safire, it got a boost in 1940 from Harold Stassen, the Republican Convention keynoter that year, who used it to signify disapproval of such less than fully democratic Democratic machine bosses as Frank Hague of Jersey City and Tom Pendergast of Kansas City. Senator Joseph McCarthy made it a regular part of his arsenal of insults, which served to dampen its popularity for a while. There was another spike in 1976, when grumpy, growly Bob Dole denounced “Democrat wars” (those were the days!) in his Vice-Presidential debate with Walter Mondale. Growth has been steady for the last couple of decades, and today we find ourselves in a golden age of anti-“ic”-ism.

In the conservative media, the phenomenon feeds more voraciously the closer you get to the mucky, sludgy bottom. “Democrat Party” is standard jargon on right-wing talk radio and common on winger Web sites like NewsMax.com, which blue-pencils Associated Press dispatches to de-“ic” references to the Party of F.D.R. and J.F.K. (The resulting impression that “Democrat Party” is O.K. with the A.P. is as phony as a North Korean travel brochure.) The respectable conservative journals of opinion sprinkle the phrase around their Web sites but go light on it in their print editions. William F. Buckley, Jr., the Miss Manners cum Dr. Johnson of modern conservatism, dealt with the question in a 2000 column in National Review, the magazine he had founded forty-five years before. “I have an aversion to ‘Democrat’ as an adjective,” Buckley began.

http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/08/07/060807ta_talk_hertzberg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camera obscura Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. William F. Buckley - known elitist. Probably a secret Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Thanks for the article...
I've read about that, too. These people need to be called out by the President to set them straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #16
32. "One Syllable Of Civility"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/21/AR2006112101223.html



"Democrat Party was used, pardon the phrase, liberally by Wisconsin Sen. Joseph McCarthy. According to the Columbia Guide to Standard American English, " Democrat as an adjective is still sometimes used by some twentieth-century Republicans as a campaign tool but was used with particular virulence" by McCarthy, "who sought by repeatedly calling it the Democrat party to deny it any possible benefit of the suggestion that it might also be democratic." The word also achieved a prominent run with Bob Dole's especially ugly reference to "Democrat wars" during the 1976 vice presidential debate."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hologram Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
54. "DemocRAT"
Used as an adjective it is clearly pejorative. There is no adjectival form of the word "democrat" in either the Concise Oxford English Dictionary or the American Heritage Dictionary and no doubt many others. The "DemocRAT" form was spread far and wide on right wing Internets sites and that probably accounts for the current widespread use even in Congress. I think Pelosi should have called it out of order when they started using it on the floor of the House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camera obscura Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. Lieberman used it too... while still trying to claim he was a member of the party... gotta love it
these people are hilarious!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
20. I've noticed it too. It's a real surge
and Chris Matthews let some woman (I think she was a right-wing talk show host) get away with it yesterday.

Clearly, someone got the talking points out. Republicans "in disarray" my ass. They are like a really mean animal cornered in a cave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chrisnreno Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
21. Is there anyway we could maybe get a petition going on this?
I'm sick to death of hearing them disrespect our party like that. I want to demand that Obama demand them to cut it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. I don't know how, but I'm sure it could be done.
I'M sick to death of it, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ericgtr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
22. I was all for this in the beginning but now I say they can all go to hell
Fuck them and their support of that racist prick Limbaugh. Obama, quit pandering to these assholes who want to hold our county back. I can't believe I even thought the idea of bipartisanship was a good idea, what was I thinking!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. I think Obama should KEEP showing his willingness to work with the Republic party...
the more he does and the more the Repubs. keep disrespecting him, Obama will be seen as the winner. The Repub. party's ratings will drop even further.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
24. That's because they know the REAL name for the Democratic party is......
.... the preferred party of the American voters. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. You're right...
but I STILL wish they'd be told to stop by Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
29. Interesting Article From Ruth Marcus (2006)
Edited on Wed Jan-28-09 03:50 PM by Dinger
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/21/AR2006112101223.html


"Democrat Party was used, pardon the phrase, liberally by Wisconsin Sen. Joseph McCarthy. According to the Columbia Guide to Standard American English, " Democrat as an adjective is still sometimes used by some twentieth-century Republicans as a campaign tool but was used with particular virulence" by McCarthy, "who sought by repeatedly calling it the Democrat party to deny it any possible benefit of the suggestion that it might also be democratic." The word also achieved a prominent run with Bob Dole's especially ugly reference to "Democrat wars" during the 1976 vice presidential debate."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
30. "to deny positive appellation" Frank Luntz & others focus grouped it out of their lexicon
republicans are not associated with Democratic process or themes they are corporal/corporate; believing that governance is not required to be civil but flows when they decide that it does but always down, from above, and from the hands of they determined to be the power elite...republicans

The Democratic Party has Democracy right there in it; republican intent is to stagger & stumble the relationship the Democratic Party has to Democratic themes. It's really all republicans have had for decades now; obfuscating the hopes & dreams of We ~ The American People http://mediamatters.org/items/200608160005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cornus Donating Member (720 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
34. Many ignorant people do not know the difference...
...between a noun and an adjective. Those who use use it like an adjective are just exhibiting their ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. I think they're purposely doing it. They do know better. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cornus Donating Member (720 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. My point was...
...that the mere fact that they're doing it on purpose even though they know it's wrong is what makes them ignorant. Let's just keep reminding them whenever we hear them using it, i.e., remind them of their ignorance!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. Oh, ok...
My bad. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NatBurner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
35. i remember carville correcting someone on CNN once
can't remember who tho
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
38. Contessa Brewer (MSNBC) introduced a guy a couple days ago as a "Republic Party Analyst"
.
.

And you should have seen the look on his face!!

She had two guests on to discuss the stimulus package-- and as she introduced them, she said "Democratic Party Anyalist" and "Republic Party Analyst"..

I'm sure it was just a slip of the tongue for her, but I hope she does it again!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. She impressed me yesterday. Everytime she interviewed an R spewing their usual
bs on tax cuts, infrastructure projects, etc. she counter argued a with Democratic position. She was pretty vicious quite a few times - Loved her! She even countered the R meme that people who don't pay taxes don't deserve a stimulus check.

She really surprised me with her ruthlessness :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. I missed that! But I DID see her read Rush's quote and SHE called it the "Democratic Party"
even though Rush's quote was the "Democrat Party." :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
40. And anytime a DU'er wants to hear someone rail against the "Republic" Party, remember.........
.
.


----> It is only a youtube click away -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wsqprEihjXg

Anthony Weiner (D) New York rips the "Republic" Party" !!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #40
46. HAHAHAHA!
Thanks for that! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #46
53. Dontcha just love that Jen?
.
.

I can't remember which of our awesome DU'ers posted that on the very day that NY Congressman ripped the "Republic" Party and that was filmed, but I sure do remember how much we all got a kick out of it!!!!

Congressman Anthony Weiner is too cool! ~~~~ He rips Rethugs by day, and is the goalie on a local hockey team in his area during his off time.

I'm jealous of our lucky ducky New York DU'ers!!

Still.... I love them (and our DU'ers from every state, nation and planet) to pieces!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. Oh.... and p.s. Jennie Jen....
.
.



I posted the above.. then I was just thinking to myself.. huh - - after posting all of that, what if Jen is from NY?

I checked and.... (((((( ))))))

I swear, I didn't even know!!!

So make that.. I am jealous of YOU TOO Jen!!!

You lucky ducky duck!! ~~~~~~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. Well...
My congressman is Eliot Engel. But HE'S a Dem. and he was brave enough to go on The Colbert Report:
http://www.colbertnation.com/video/tag/Eliot+Engel
But still, thanks for the sentiment. :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. Yup...
Yup, he IS cool!

I'm from NY, but not his district. But that's nice of you! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
43. Or shall we all say RepubliCON party?
The Republicons.

But in our case, the corporate media, dominated by right wing ownership, won't go along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. I said the same thing up-thread!
:fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Whoops! But glad to hear it is on our minds.
And I liked the discussion elsewhere on this site about making sure to call the current crisis the Bush Depression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. No "whoops" needed...
I think it's a good thing that I'm not the only one with that idea. And I like the idea of calling it the Bush Depression, too. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Republicon policies brought us the Bush Depression.
So I didn't want the Democrats to compromise with them.

But President Obama is a great strategist, so he may have wanted our fellow citizens to see those gross Republicon leaders in all their obstructionist glory.

And perhaps next time the Republicons push their policies, he can refuse them by noting that they didn't compromise on the stimulus plan and he doesn't feel the need to compromise with them any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #43
50. I like "RepubliCON" but also "RepubliCANT Party"
"Republicant" was suggested by Sherman Yellen on HuffPo back in 2006 -- -- even before Obama began his campaign. Today, of course, "Republicant" ties in very nicely as a contrast to "Yes, We Can".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #43
58. Great minds!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
51. Are you new here?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. Yes. And I'm sure you knew that after looking at my profile.
:sarcasm: If your point is they HAVE been calling it the "Democrat party," MY point is they're claiming to want to be part of this new bipartisanship, and blaming the "Democrat party" for NOT acting in a bi-partisan way. AND, Obama should CALL them on it. (Or maybe Pelosi should do it.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
57. ASSHOLES!
I heard this over and over in the last few days, Democrat party. Screw those fuckers! I am now boycotting the word Republican. It will now and forever be Republicon in my vocabulary. I know Obama wouldn't like me-I'm not bipartisan.

But the are CONS every last one. CON meaning fake, fraud and AGAINST anything good for humanity. (WHEW. That felt good.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. It's really getting to the point where this NEEDS to be addressed by someone
high up in the Dem. party!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
61. It's how you know they aren't serious about bipartisanship
They know it gets under our skin and they use it to piss us off. If by some miracle they are serious about working with the other side they will stop doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
62. Typical from the Republic Party.
What can one expect from Republics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
63. Our President did the same thing yesterday, you know...
I done seen it on the teevee.

It must be correct if he does it, right?

(It's appeasing crap, akin to being cowed into never using the term "liberal".)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Sheds Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
64. if they want to be rude by dropping a syllable, we should answer by adding one...
The use of the term "Christianist" has been talked about as a way of referring to our domestic Taliban (I enthusiastically endorse the use of that term). We should do the same with "Republican." They should be called "Republicanists."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nurgel Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
65. About time
they show some respect to the WINNERS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. It's PAST time...
whether we're the winners or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
themaguffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
66. Well the republic party - excuse me the Southern Regional party - I mean the Confederate party...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. The Racist party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC