Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"...the Democrats fear the Bushies are capable of any level of deceit."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 07:31 AM
Original message
"...the Democrats fear the Bushies are capable of any level of deceit."
MoDowd is at least in touch with that reality.
========================================================
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/16/opinion/16dowd.html

<snip>
ere's how bad off the Democrats are: They're cowering behind closed doors, whispering that if it should ever turn out that Republicans are behind this, it would be so exquisitely Machiavellian, so beyond what Democrats are capable of, they should just fold and concede the election now - before the Republicans have to go to the trouble of stealing it again.

There's no evidence - it's just a preposterous, paranoid fantasy at this point. But it speaks to the jitters of the Democrats that they're consumed with speculation about whether Karl Rove, the master of dirty tricks and surrogate sleaze, could have set up CBS in a diabolical pre-emptive strike to undermine damaging revelations about Bush 43's privileged status and vanishing act in the National Guard, and his odd refusal to take his required physical when ordered.

In this vast left-wing conspiracy theory, Mr. Rove takes real evidence on W.'s shirking and transfers it to documents doomed to be exposed as phony (thereby undermining the real goods), then funnels it through third parties to Dan Rather, Bush 41's nemesis on Iran-contra. A perfect bank shot.

<snip>
The Democratic paranoia is a measure of the intimidation the West Wing is wielding in a race where John Kerry can't seem to take advantage of any of the Bush administration's increasingly calamitous blunders.

....more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Dowd's another example of media whore extraordinaire.
She's absolutely right about Democrats cowering behind closed doors but she fails to mention her own contributions to this situation.

Anytime a Democrat makes a strong stand, one of the first columnists that we can count on to make snarky comments about it is Dowd. With her you're definitely damned if you do and damned if you don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. As usual, however, she also has some scorching words for our oppo --
"Iraq is a vision of hell, and the Republicans act as if it's a model kitchen. The president and vice president brag about liberating Iraqis and reassure us that they are stopping terrorist violence at its source and inspiring democracy in the region by bringing it to blood-drenched Iraq.

But what they haven't mentioned is that they have known since July that their rosy scenarios are as bogus as their W.M.D. That's when the president received a national intelligence estimate that spelled out 'a dark assessment of prospects' for stability and governance in Iraq in the next 18 months, as Douglas Jehl wrote in today's Times. Worst-case estimates include civil war or anarchy.

Unlike the president, THE YOUNG MEN AND WOMEN TRYING TO STAY ALIVE IN THE UNRAVELING CHAOS OF IRAQ CAN'T COUNT ON THEIR DADDIES TO GET THEM OUT OF THE LINE OF FIRE."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. No doubt that she's on our side
she just has a funny way of showing it at times. I would have enjoyed her column much more without her proclaiming that we are "cowering." She's in a position of influence and would best serve her own/our cause by taking those concerns directly to the Democratic leaders. There's a big difference between her, and say any of us, being so openly critical of the Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. It seems she feels she has to throw zingers at our side...
in about every column, especially zingers at Bill Clinton. I e-mailed her once about a particularly good column, but pointed out that some Clinton zingers seemed added on, had nothing to do with the subject, and disrupted the flow of her writing, to the detriment of the piece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Zanti Regent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Whoreen is on her own side
Whoreen could care less about Democrats since she pisses on Hillary, Bill, Al Gore and the Kerrys all the times. AND she always kisses the Chimp's ass in the end. Reading her columns proves she's addicted to the brown lipstick that comes from the Chimp's ass!

She's every bit the liar that Judith Miller is and more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. And, yet, here we have a presumed Democrat taking a strong stand,
calling out the President consistently when no other Op-Ed writer will, and a poster (the first, in fact) making "snarky" comments about it.

You seem to be emulating your own example of "whore extraordinaire."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catfight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. Dowd is old and tired, no one reads her anymore. We need steady
common sense, writing for me to buy the NYTime again. The only one left to read that has been consistent and realistic has been Krugman. I was a faithful Dowd reader until she shacked up with the drug addict and began writing fluff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. ''until she shacked up with the drug addict ''
huh?

for those of us on the outside.......

who?

thx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
6. I think she can be insightful....
and say things that nobody else will say...or hasn't thought to say..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC