Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rush Job: Inside Dems' Limbaugh plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 11:34 AM
Original message
Rush Job: Inside Dems' Limbaugh plan
*** From Politico.***

Top Democrats believe they have struck political gold by depicting Rush Limbaugh as the new face of the Republican Party, a full-scale effort first hatched by some of the most familiar names in politics and now being guided in part from inside the White House.

The strategy took shape after Democratic strategists Stanley Greenberg and James Carville included Limbaugh’s name in an October poll and learned their longtime tormentor was deeply unpopular with many Americans, especially younger voters. Then the conservative talk-radio host emerged as an unapologetic critic of Barack Obama shortly before his inauguration, when even many Republicans were showering him with praise.

Soon it clicked: Democrats realized they could roll out a new GOP bogeyman for the post-Bush era by turning to an old one in Limbaugh, a polarizing figure since he rose to prominence in the 1990s.

Limbaugh is embracing the line of attack, suggesting a certain symbiosis between him and his political adversaries.

"The administration is enabling me,” he wrote in an e-mail to POLITICO. “They are expanding my profile, expanding my audience and expanding my influence. An ever larger number of people are now being exposed to the antidote to Obamaism: conservatism, as articulated by me. An ever larger number of people are now exposed to substantive warnings, analysis and criticism of Obama's policies and intentions, a ‘story’ I own because the is largely the Obama Press Office.”

The bigger, the better, agreed Carville. “It’s great for us, great for him, great for the press,” he said of Limbaugh. “The only people he’s not good for are the actual Republicans in Congress.”

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0309/19596.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Xolodno Donating Member (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well...
This is interesting.

The prevailing thought is that the hard right is on its death bed. And Rush seems to think he is going to be the man who will give the hard right a renewal.

Its a gamble, and the odds are stacked against Rush.

The moderates of the party probably know this as well and figure if they give the hard right enough rope, they will hang themselves. Once they are done hanging, begin the process of rebuilding. The hard right is in denial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think it's a good tactic.
BUSH-LIMBAUGH. We need to prevent the Republicans from "re-branding."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Absurd
Limbaugh has been dogging Carville to death for 17 years. I have been hearing Limbaugh's Clinton and Carville imitations for at least that long. Now suddenly its a masterstroke to go after Limbaugh? Ingenius?

This is so stupid its funny. If its true that these guys used polling, and high-level operatives to figure this out, then we are in worse trouble than I thought.

This is not an ingenius strategy, its called self-defense. Thing is, it took 17+ years for our side to figure it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alwysdrunk Donating Member (908 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The oppurtunity only came up this year
After Bush was gone. No one would agree that Rush was the head of the GOP during the Bush years. Bush (really Cheney) was obviously the head. Now this is not just a political trick. There is enough evidence out there for people to think that he actually IS the party leader. The Steele apology cemented that idea for a lot of people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. the previous poster is recoiling at the fact Carville/Begala/Emanuel are involved
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Nonsense. But I do accept your apology...
for misrepresenting my views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I gave no apology, and I find it amazing you're the only one ...
... who thinks the premise of the OP is absurd. Writers are writing about it. Pundits are talking about it. Here comes sampsonblk who outsmarts them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. You are over-thinking
There are always opportunites. People who have courage take them. Others wait around and take polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. odd reaction from you
Given that it wasn't until last October that the polling evidence mentioned in the piece was found.

But I do know where you're coming from - you hate to see Carville's name attached to anything successful.

But perhaps you can point to any obviously organized effort by the Democratic party to go after Limbaugh pre-October 08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Wrong
I have no problem with Carville. Never have.

My point is that Rush Limbaugh has been around for ages. Only a complete idiot would need a poll to figure out that we need to go after him immediately. This has to be the dumbest thing I have seen in years. A poll??? Someone needed a poll???

Oh wait. Maybe the GOP will wait a decade or so and take a poll to see who (if anyone) they should go after people on our side.

C'mon. Some stuff is common sense. And if anyone takes this long to arrive at common sense, they don't deserve any brownie points for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Limbaugh is dogging Carville?? Matlalin and Carville have attended private

dinner parties at Limbaugh's house in
the company of Alito and others.

Carville is a self promoting slime
merchant just like the large one.

This controversy has been concocted
by Rushbo and Carville so that they
and others so they can keep their
jobs.

Personally I don't think Pres Barack
gives a damn what Limbaugh, Carville or
Rove have to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. DING! DING! DING! We have a winner :-).
"Carville is a self promoting slime ..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. can't stand it, can you? All you hate are coming back around
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalyke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't think the Democrats are depicting Rush as the new face of the GOP.
I think Republicans are.

Why else would they all have to apologize to him when they question his ideas and/or authority?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Ding Ding Ding! You got it! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cash_thatswhatiwant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
16. Genius. The more Rush can be tied to Republicans the better,
and they're just playing into this strategies hands..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC