Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain Writing His Own 'Contract With America' (you can't make this shit up)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 04:00 PM
Original message
McCain Writing His Own 'Contract With America' (you can't make this shit up)
McCain Prepping 'Contract With America' Style Economic Plan

Sen. John McCain is putting together a major economic plan that will be structured, in some ways, off of Newt Gingrich's famous Contract With America.

In an email obtained by the Huffington Post, the Arizona Republican's chief of staff, Marc Buse, asked an outside adviser for help with a "ten principles" program that the senator could use as a "definitive" platform.

"We are looking for some guidance on a definitive plan (aka contract with america style) on the economy...principles," writes Buse. "Ten principles that JSM could point to on what MUST BE DONE to address the problems our nation faces."

Buse doesn't offer specific suggestions of his own, save "NO TAX INCREASES."

The email is interesting for a variety of reasons. Most obviously, it advances the notion that McCain is eager to remain a key national political figure and Republican Party leader. The Senator has, at times, been an ally of the current White House. But on economic matters (the stimulus and omnibus first and foremost), he has vocally opposed the Obama agenda.

The fact that he is going outside the Senate office for advice on a "definitive plan" modeled off of Gingrich's work suggests McCain is laying the groundwork for more comprehensive opposition. Gingrich and his Republican colleagues famously introduced their blueprint for a GOP renaissance six weeks before the 1994 midterm elections.

Whether McCain is hoping to spearhead a reenactment of the '94 effort in 2010 or simply put together new policies for the changed economic landscape was not detailed in Buse's note. An email to the chief of staff and a spokesperson asking for clarification went un-returned.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/10/mccain-prepping-contract_n_173574.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ain't that the truth. 2nd time he's hitched his wagon to a losing cause. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. McCain's Contract With America:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I just sprayed iced tea all over my monitor!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Tiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. McCain's Contract With America PT2:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. That's a terrific, and oh, so true, visual!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. He's about 9 months late to the party.
Nice try, asshat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Clueless McCain
Not a new idea among any of the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RT Atlanta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sue him for: breach of contract
We know he will breach the terms sooner or later (like Newt). Further, if we really want to analyze the "contract" what is the "bargained for exchange?" What's the consideration?

What a miserable old irrelevant piece of shit. Couldnt he have just ridden off into the sunset and let his daughter get her groove back?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. sounds like something from the Sopranos
'contract'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camera obscura Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. Who is the target audience? The 2% of the Republican party that doesn't hate his guts?
Oh right... the media.

I'm sure we'll hear all about how this is a return to his mavericky ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. 2%? That's high. I'd have given him .25%.
The media works though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camera obscura Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. That Rasmussen poll the other day had his support as "Leader of the GOP" at about that high...
... maybe it's BS, but I did enjoy that it was higher than Sarah Palin. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. No kidding. Hah! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. The NYT already had a major article
speaking of how he is after losing is still leading - unlike Gore and Kerry.

The fact is that Gore moved the population of not just the US on the issue of global warning. Kerry authored various scenarios to resolve the war in Iraq - his 2005 plan was pretty much taken by the Iraq Study group and his Kerry/Feingold plan's blueprint was used for every Democratic plan since - including both Obama's and Clinton's - they mostly just pushed out the time line and kept more troops afterward. Substantial leadership on two really big issues.

McCain has yet to propose any significant plan on anything - no earmarks is not a plan. (By this time, Kerry had gone on a major trip to Europe and the Middle East - and came back with news that France, Germany, Egypt, and Jordan were willing to train in their countries the Iraqi soldiers. Rice at her confirmation told him it was not necessary that they were moving ahead satisfactorily on that - - which is why Obama is now speaking of troops to train the Iraqis. Rice also was pushed to say that Pakistan's control of A Q Khan was adequate. In 2005 and 2006, there was no one on talk shows articulating a Democratic alternative better than Kerry - and without him, there likely would not have been a Democratic Iraq plan to point to in 2006 and unify behind in concept in 2007/2008.

(the NYT called this convalescing quietly - I bet Bush had a different definition of "quiet".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. Now they are trying COMEDY....? This has to be a JOKE
Then they go and ask for 10 principles too? They HAVE to ASK? THEY DON'T KNOW?

OMG...

How do they work that one in??

McCain: "We are looking for 10 Principles to Borrow and Use"

The nx GOP election effort will see the demise of the Pub Party as we know them....they will have to change drastically in order to be viable once more...

Al Franken will be seated sometime soon...Coleman is making an ass of himself...

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Hiya Opi
:hi:

talk about dead men walking :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. These Dudes are so desperate it has become a Parade of Failures
McLame should be planting flowers and/or fruit trees...

His Brain was rained on by Obama

Cain is not the same man of 10 years ago....he is Whithered and Weathered

Its Pasture Time for him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
15. Does he not realize he lost......by a landslide? Jeez n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
16. Is this the same John McCain...
that we just turned down for a four year employment contract?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
17. P.S., John, you lost
America already signed its contract with PRESIDENT Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
18. I suppose he's suspended his Senate seat to work on this.
What an asshat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. The "Liberal" Press Will Be Getting Talking Points Soon!
Maybe Krugman will actually address this with something more than a blog entry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
21. The fact that he is going outside the Senate office for advice on a "definitive plan"
once again shows he can't think of anything on his own.
So what he is really going to come up with is " some advisor's" plan.

Gee... Rush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alwysdrunk Donating Member (908 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
22. At least he's trying
I'd rather see the Republicans coming up with their own proposals, SOMETHING other than "well my conservative principles don't allow me to support that, so I must obstruct"....

This Rush Limbaugh "we don't have to have our own policies" shit needs to stop. Pure obstruction and nothing else needs to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
23. #1: Term limits. That was a big part of Newt's package in 1994.
Of course, every single Republican who signed that 'pledge' conveniently ignored it once they came due.

#2: Balanced budget amendment. Well, you had 6 years of Republican one-party rule from 2001 and never came close to a balanced budget. As a matter of fact, you weaseled around the existing budget rules and left 1/2 your spending off budget.

#3: Line item veto: Hey, that's one thing that actually got passed in 94. Unfortunately, 'activists' judges on the Supreme Court struck it down. Then again, it was your own party who filed to have it struck down, so it's not like you were really serious.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmilyAnne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
24. Will it be called "Keeping The Fundamentals of the Economy Strong?" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
25. Straight out of the playbook.
Next up: the scandal. Anyone want to bet that our heroic federal DA Fitzgerald is the key here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
28. Is the first principle in the 'new' contratc going to be
Fifty-four Forty Or Fight?

Or maybe, Remember The Maine!

McFail.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grateful for Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
29. Poor guy
He can't seem to heal that bruised ego after two major losses. This latest attempt at relevance (and authority) is sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC