|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
masuki bance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-14-09 02:45 PM Original message |
Yeah right- "A source close to Mr Obama's top team..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-14-09 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
1. The DVD thing was weird. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-14-09 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
2. Telegraph always does this "unnamed staffer" crap to Barack... it's a Rupert Murdoch rag. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-14-09 02:51 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. No, it's owned by the (still right wing) Barclay brothers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-14-09 04:16 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. Read this: "Murdoch (Rupert that is) extends his Daily Telegraph links" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackeens (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-14-09 04:39 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Murdoch's company only prints the Telegraph, the loathsome Barclay Bros still own it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-15-09 10:03 AM Response to Reply #12 |
24. Well, doesn't that make it a Murdoch rag, literally? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-15-09 01:12 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Not when you're looking at it on the internet, no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-15-09 01:18 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Um, a former News Ltd. exec's "staff of 140 is now subediting about 1800 pages a week." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-15-09 03:23 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. "the travel, motoring and money pages"; and Fairfax co-owns that company |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-15-09 03:41 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Unnamed sources are never "trustworthy" no matter what the paper. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-15-09 04:16 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. And did the Guardian co-owning Trafford Park influence what appeared in the Telegraph? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-15-09 04:45 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Equating the Guardian's influence to Rupert Murdoch's is somewhat specious at best. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-14-09 06:38 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. Printing is not the same as publishing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-15-09 10:03 AM Response to Reply #18 |
25. See reply #24. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Medusa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-15-09 10:08 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Most of the British newspapers print lies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-15-09 10:34 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. rofl! Well-said and oh-so-true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-14-09 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
4. What a load of right wing bullshit! They covered all the talking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-14-09 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
5. His polls #'s have NOT slumped though. Its only Rasmussen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-14-09 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
6. I do think the DVD gift thing and the return of Churchill's bust was weird at least... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
masuki bance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-14-09 03:18 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Can you provide phone records? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asphalt.jungle (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-14-09 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
7. the telegraph is not a credible newspaper |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-14-09 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
9. To hell with their queen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
regnaD kciN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-14-09 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
10. It's the Daily Torygraph... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snowbear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-14-09 04:49 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. I detect a pattern with this OP.. He keeps dragging in these same types of articles.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-14-09 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
14. With everything else going on .... DVD???? REALLLY?????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-14-09 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
15. The Telegraph = The Globe here (Batboy et al.) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-14-09 06:40 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Exactly...I was the Telegraph?! That newspaper doesn't have credibility. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-15-09 01:17 AM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Surely you must mean the Independent, not the Times. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-15-09 01:13 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. The Times is the one that's Murdoch-owned (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snowbear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-15-09 12:48 AM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Sad when so many here are citing the Telegraph, WND, CNS, Faux.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monmouth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-14-09 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
16. Another "source" I heard about was that Gordon Brown loves films |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rox63 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-14-09 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
17. Which Obama "top team" would that be? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-15-09 12:51 AM Response to Original message |
21. It's so refreshing to read right-wing garbage from overseas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norrin Radd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-15-09 01:02 AM Response to Original message |
22. Heads of state shouldn't be giving each others artifacts, or parts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-15-09 03:37 PM Response to Reply #22 |
32. Totally agree. I think the DVDs were more appropriate actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-15-09 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
36. Well, if the source didn't actually say it- someone should have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-15-09 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
37. If the Obama White House "want people to know" that THEY know they've "made mistakes" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC