Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So two weeks ago it was called the Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-23-09 07:08 PM
Original message
So two weeks ago it was called the Obama
meltdown, they said the stock market preformed worse in his first 50 days then any other President in history. Hum, what is this recent rally being called the Bush Recovery?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Baltoman991 Donating Member (869 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-23-09 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well
Dana Perrino did tell us last week the day it went up 200 points that George Bush deserved some credit for the uptick...............Soooooooooooooo, I imagine they'll be plastering their faces on the tube tomorrow looking for a pat on the back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-23-09 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. She was probably right, I imagine once people finally
realized the village idiot left town it may have caused the uptick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-23-09 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, because the Bush Administration is the one that brought out this plan that was presented
today. :eyes: :sarcasm:

NOTE: this snarky sarcasm isn't directed at the OP, but the idiots in the M$M and Repukes that try to attribute any of this to Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. What say you?
If Obama responsible for the uptick in the stock market?

If so, was he responsible for the temporary slump?

Is there any unaccounted for asymmetry in your answers?

As far as I'm concerned, I can't tell. The stock market reflects a combination of things ... and how to tease them apart in the short term is beyond my ken. Optimism/pessimism, political events, overreaction to immediate fiscal problems, long-term thinking on the economy (and more!). If the long-term thinking predominates, it's a decent leading indicator; if the immediate political events dominate, then Obama's right and it's a political poll; if immediate fiscal problems, it's a gauge of the current economy; if optimism/pessimism then it's a barometer of the investing class's psychological state, if not their psychological pathologies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC