Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Robert Reich: Why It Makes No Sense for States to Cut Services and Raise Taxes Now

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 03:35 PM
Original message
Robert Reich: Why It Makes No Sense for States to Cut Services and Raise Taxes Now
THURSDAY, APRIL 09, 2009

Why It Makes No Sense for States to Cut Services and Raise Taxes Now

With the real economy continuing to shrink, and unemployment now claiming almost one out of six American workers, the economy will almost surely be more than $1 trillion short of its capacity this year, and another $1 trillion short next year. That means the $787 billion stimulus package covering 2009 and 2010 won't nearly do the trick-- even if every federal dollar of it stimulates $1.5 dollars in private spending (about the most that can be expected). Don't count on the bank bailouts to stimulate much of anything except fat paychecks for bank executives and directors. Unless or until Americans get their jobs back and feel more secure about the future, they won't borrow.

Sinking or vanishing American incomes are also causing tax revenues to drop. That's not much of a problem for the federal government, which can run deficits. But most state governments are required by their state constitutions to balance their budgets. Even though the states will be getting some stimulus money, their revenues are falling even faster.

The result? States continue to cut back vital services. They're chopping K-12 school budgets, whacking after-school programs, cutting back on child health, reducing aid to the homeless, and cutting other social services that are more important now than when the economy is doing well. And when they aren't cutting services, the states are raising taxes. At least ten states are considering major increases in sales or incomes taxes -- including Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Minnesota, Oregon, Washington, and Wisconsin. California and New York have already instituted multibillion-dollar tax increases that went into effect earlier this year.

All told, state service cuts and likely tax increases will total about $350 billion over 2oo9 and 2010. This is nuts -- exactly the opposite of what government needs to be doing. That $350 billion is a huge fiscal drag on the U.S. economy. It essentially negates almost half of the federal stimulus.

Let's hope the Obama administration returns to Congress soon for a second stimulus -- a large chunk of which should help the states maintain vital services and avoid tax increases, and that Congress heeds the request. (And let's hope the administration makes this pitch to Congress before it tries to get more money for the bailouts of Wall Street, the automakers, life insurers, or any other industry whose bondholders and shareholders should be taking the hit rather than taxpayers.)

posted by Robert Reich

http://robertreich.blogspot.com/2009/04/why-it-makes-no-sense-for-states-to-cut.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Should have mentioned that to the Senate "Democrats"
Edited on Thu Apr-09-09 03:41 PM by depakid
who axed $40+ billion in federal revenue sharing from the stimulus package.

Heck of job!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. He is correct. We are in this mess because unemployment means
less people are paying into the government tax fund. So cutting out more jobs is hardly going to improve the situation. And cutting more taxes will not increase jobs - I don't think it ever has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. It makes no economic sense -- quite the contrary.
But since states cannot run budget deficits, they are sometimes forced to do this.

Only the Feds can do anything, by stepping in and subsidizing states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC