|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
HopeOverFear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-25-09 10:18 PM Original message |
If Bush had gotten involved with AG Gonzales in prosecuting Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-25-09 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
1. OK. So How Can Obama Tell Holder Not To Prosecute The "Only Following Orders" Crowd? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-25-09 10:23 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. He won't. But would that make Manny happy? Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-25-09 10:25 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. No. The WH Has Said They Won't Be Prosecuted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-25-09 10:29 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Your first link doesn't work and your second one is from 17 Apr. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-25-09 10:31 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Sorry, Here's The Correct Link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-25-09 10:45 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. No, I'm saying it's now in Holder's hands. Obama has less than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-25-09 11:04 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. So You're Saying That The DOJ Wasn't Independent A Week Ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-25-09 11:22 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. I responded to your statement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-25-09 11:30 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Because Obama Is Trying To Sweep War Crimes Under The Rug |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-26-09 12:24 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. He is not and stop saying that. And why don't you tell me why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-25-09 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
6. Thank You. I want the Obama Administration to stay out of Holder's business. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeOverFear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-25-09 11:51 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Absolutely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 01:28 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC