Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Newsweek: What He's Learned - A Conversation With Barack Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 01:27 AM
Original message
Newsweek: What He's Learned - A Conversation With Barack Obama
Edited on Sun May-17-09 01:49 AM by Turborama
By Jon Meacham
Published May 16, 2009
From the magazine issue dated May 25, 2009

In a 30-minute interview aboard Air Force One en route from Washington to Phoenix last Wednesday, President Obama talked with NEWSWEEK's Jon Meacham about Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, Pakistan, Dick Cheney—and Star Trek. Edited excerpts:

Meacham: The theme here is what you've learned. What's the hardest thing you've had to do?
The President: Order 17,000 additional troops into Afghanistan. There is a sobriety that comes with a decision like that because you have to expect that some of those young men and women are going to be harmed in the theater of war. And making sure that you have thought through every angle and have put together the best possible strategy, but still understanding that in a situation like Afghanistan the task is extraordinarily difficult and there are no guarantees, that makes it a very complicated and difficult decision.

Can anything get you ready to be a war president?
Well, I think that it certainly helps to know the broader strategic issues involved. I think that's more important than understanding the tactics involved because there are just some extraordinary commanders on the ground and a lot of good advisers who I have a lot of confidence in, but the president has to make a decision: will the application of military force in this circumstance meet the broader national-security goals of the United States? And you can't do that without understanding, let's say in Afghanistan, how that connects to Pakistan and what the nature of the insurgency there is, and what the history of the Soviet invasion was. So having some context, I think, is critical.

The other thing that's critical, I think, is having spent a couple of years on the campaign trail and then a number of years as a senator, meeting with young men and women who've served, and their families, and the families of soldiers who never came back, and knowing the price that's being paid by those who you're sending.

Can you talk about how you reached the surge decision?
I think the starting point was a recognition that the existing trajectory was not working, that the Taliban had made advances, that our presence in Afghanistan was declining in popularity, that the instability along the border region was destabilizing Pakistan as well. So that was the starting point of the decision.

We then embarked on a strategic review that involved every aspect of our government's involvement—Defense, State Department, intelligence operations, aid operations. Once that strategic review had been completed, then I sat in a room with the principals and argued about it, and listened to various perspectives, saw a range of options in terms of how we could move forward; asked them to go back and rework their numbers and reconsider certain positions based on the fact that some of the questions I asked could not be answered. And when I finally felt that every approach—every possible approach—had been aired, that all the questions had either been answered or were unanswerable, at that point I had to make a decision and I did.

Continues: http://www.newsweek.com/id/197891

Single page version: http://www.newsweek.com/id/197891/output/print

Photos: http://www.newsweek.com/id/197291
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
watrwefitinfor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for the link to the print version! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. You're welcome! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Excellent interview. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Very interesting read....
It is so refreshing to read Obama's complete answers to important questions instead of seeing/hearing mere sound-bites deliberately chosen to inflame/increase ratings.

Thanks for posting this, it is much appreciated.

Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I found it refreshing too, for the same reasons.
You're most welcome, it's nice to know you think it was as significant an interview as I did.

Thanks for the rec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sojourner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. hm...so maybe Obama isn't finished with his agenda re: tribunals, etc?
Edited on Sun May-17-09 12:17 PM by sojourner
Edited to change "gitmo" to "tribunals" -

Maybe his recent "decisions" are preliminary, to stabilize things while studying how to make the needed corrections?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sojourner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. delete --- duplicated
Edited on Sun May-17-09 12:13 PM by sojourner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC