Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama may intentionally draw fire for his SC nominee to deflect opposition from HC & Environ legis.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 06:35 PM
Original message
Obama may intentionally draw fire for his SC nominee to deflect opposition from HC & Environ legis.
By drawing fire to its Supreme Court nominee, Obama’s aides believe that healthcare and environmental politics may face less intense opposition.
:evilgrin:

Obama’s Secret Supreme Court Strategy

by Richard Wolffe

The president will reawaken his dormant grassroots network to push his imminent High Court pick, The Daily Beast’s Richard Wolffe reports – a plan designed to divert attention away from his real summer agenda.
The White House is planning to revive President Obama’s 13-million-member grassroots campaign network, largely dormant since last year’s election, as it rolls out its first Supreme Court nominee as early as this week.

Senior Obama aides tell the Daily Beast that the network, which revolutionized fundraising and online political networking during the 2008 campaign, will be an important factor in a series of high-profile political struggles unfolding over the next two months. Besides the Supreme Court fight, the senior aides expect to bring universal healthcare to the president’s desk, while simultaneously making significant progress on global warming legislation, including a cap-and-trade system for greenhouse gases.

By drawing fire to its Supreme Court nominee, Obama’s aides believe that healthcare and environmental politics may face less intense opposition.

All three initiatives would move ahead before Congress disappears for its month-long August recess, and all three face intense opposition from a conservative movement desperately seeking to rally its own supporters.


The revival of Obama’s grassroots machine represents not only an effort to neutralize any Republican onslaught, but also something of a diversionary tactic. By drawing fire to its Supreme Court nominee, Obama’s aides believe that healthcare and environmental politics may face less intense opposition.

-snip-
Now the adversaries and the issues represent a far better opportunity to energize Obama’s supporters than the dry details of a federal budget. Conservative groups are planning to demonize the new Supreme Court nominee on a range of cultural issues, including abortion and same-sex marriage. While there is little chance for Republicans to defeat the nominee in a Senate firmly under Democratic control, movement conservatives believe they can rebuild their membership with extensive advertising and online activism.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-05-25/obamas-supreme-court-diversion/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. That wouldn't be such a bad idea. He should pick the most socially liberal judge he can find. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. I doubt he will
He's not the most socially liberal politician himself so I don't see him picking a super liberal nominee either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. The hypocritical groups can go suck
on their eggs. bush got his radical SC Justices in and we're entitled to whomever Prez Obama and his team chooses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. If the pubs didn't have abortion they'd have nothing.
Freaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Much as one would like to believe the premise of the article
Fact is- anyone Obama picks is going to be vilified by the right. Makes no sense whatsoever to attempt to placate them (nor did they even make the pretense of doing so in return these past 8 years).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. placate?
I'll admit I didn't finish the article but I didn't see anything about placating the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. There wasn't anything in the article about it
The premise there is that Obama will try to draw their fire by picking someone likely to offend their ideology. My point was, that's not really necessary to get thier ire up (and I'd surely like to see Wolffe's take proven to be correct).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. That's the opposite of placating them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Yes- that's the opposite of attempting to placate them
which as mentioned, makes no sense- but which time and time again, Democrats (including the president) try to do.

What Wolffe is saying is that in this case- the strategic angle is NOT to go that way. Time will tell if that's the tack the adminstration's going to take. Or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Daily Beast?
Yeah okay, whatever. I've not found them to have the inside track on anything, and really worse analysis than MoDo, if that's possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. It's Richard Wolffe. I focus more on the author than the website. I generally
Edited on Mon May-25-09 07:10 PM by Pirate Smile
find him pretty credible although certainly not perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. He's a terrific journalist
Not a terribly good political gossip.

"The president is so "distracted by his vice president's indiscipline" that he has been forced to rebuke privately Vice President Biden, according to a new book by Richard Wolffe."
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/philip_sherwell/blog/2009/05/23/obama_distracted_by_bidens_indiscipline

Obama "so distratcted"??

I doubt it.

I don't think he's going to choose someone as important as a Supreme Court Justice to divert political attention either. He'll choose exactly who he believes is best for the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I agree. I think the RW is going to throw a fit no matter who he picks. Perhaps the Obama aides
just don't want the press playing it up as a big deal - they expect it, they welcome it. Instead of looking defensive, they can look like they planned it. They may be sick of looking reactive and want to get back on offense.

Obama will absolutely only pick who he thinks is the best choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. Dormant my ass.
Don't they know about the regular meetings, calling and door knocking going on at Organizing for America?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
15. Sounds like he pulled this out of his ass.
Unless the pick is Karlan or Sullivan. They are the only two mentioned that would possibly fit this strategy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC