They are going where they believe (and with good reason) that they can "fire up the masses," though. That's why they are doing it.
It is a sad fact that there are a substantial number of religious (and some, not-so-religious) black Americans (along with religious Americans of other ethnicities) who "have a problem" with homosexuality. The "problems" they have range from the religious objections to the cultural ones. I used to have trouble with an older and VERY religious black woman on my staff in DC who would make smart "Biblical" remarks at a gay employee, generally revolving around Leviticus. She required "counselling" on a semi-annual basis, at a minimum, and was marked down on her evals for her inability to adhere to the Equal Employment Opportunity guidelines. Part of the reason that Kirbyjon Caldwell and Donnie McClurkin "appealed" on that Carolina Bible Tour is because the unspoken suggestion being put forth during that exercise was "Hillary/Pro-Gay AKA anti-Bible" while Obama was "The Precise OPPOSITE." Nothing was said, but it didn't have to be. It wasn't "true" either, but it was a way of sending a message.
A second unfortunate reality is that way too many black (as well as other ethnicities) people who are gay are afraid to come "out" because they risk being ostracized by their ethnic community. They rationalize their behavior as "optional" because they don't want to lose that connection to the whole community, religious and traditional thing that they grew up with and from which they derive strength and comfort. Someone made a fortune on a book about fellows on the "down low" --tons of articles have been written on the topic as well--a few examples:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/05/01/MNG4TCID0F1.DTL&type=health Many down low men find it difficult to see themselves as gay because of the stigma attached to homosexuality in the black community, said Phil Wilson, executive director of the Black AIDS Institute in Los Angeles. Being gay risks rejection by family and friends.
They don't identify with gay culture, which they see as white and effeminate. And when they do venture into gay communities like San Francisco's, which are predominantly white, they feel unwelcome, according to several studies of gay men of color.
Because these men have so much at stake in keeping their sexual activity secret, it is unknown how many there are and it is difficult to trace the sexual history of their female partners.
The longer these men lead double lives, health officials say, the higher the risk for their partners.
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/03/magazine/double-lives-on-the-down-low.htmlToday, while there are black men who are openly gay, it seems that the majority of those having sex with men still lead secret lives, products of a black culture that deems masculinity and fatherhood as a black man's primary responsibility -- and homosexuality as a white man's perversion. And while Flex now offers baskets of condoms and lubricant, Wallace says that many of the club's patrons still don't use them.
Wallace ticks off the grim statistics: blacks make up only 12 percent of the population in America, but they account for half of all new reported H.I.V. infections. While intravenous drug use is a large part of the problem, experts say that the leading cause of H.I.V. in black men is homosexual sex (some of which takes place in prison, where blacks disproportionately outnumber whites). According to the Centers for Disease Control, one-third of young urban black men who have sex with men in this country are H.I.V.-positive, and 90 percent of those are unaware of their infection.
We don't hear much about this aspect of the epidemic, mostly because the two communities most directly affected by it -- the black and gay communities -- have spent the better part of two decades eyeing each other through a haze of denial or studied disinterest. For African-Americans, facing and addressing the black AIDS crisis would require talking honestly and compassionately about homosexuality -- and that has proved remarkably difficult, whether it be in black churches, in black organizations or on inner-city playgrounds. The mainstream gay world, for its part, has spent 20 years largely fighting the epidemic among white, openly gay men, showing little sustained interest in reaching minorities who have sex with men and who refuse to call themselves gay.
Rejecting a gay culture they perceive as white and effeminate, many black men have settled on a new identity, with its own vocabulary and customs and its own name: Down Low. There have always been men -- black and white -- who have had secret sexual lives with men. But the creation of an organized, underground subculture largely made up of black men who otherwise live straight lives is a phenomenon of the last decade. Many of the men at Flex tonight -- and many of the black men I met these past months in Cleveland, Atlanta, Florida, New York and Boston -- are on the Down Low, or on the DL, as they more often call it. Most date or marry women and engage sexually with men they meet only in anonymous settings like bathhouses and parks or through the Internet. Many of these men are young and from the inner city, where they live in a hypermasculine ''thug'' culture. Other DL men form romantic relationships with men and may even be peripheral participants in mainstream gay culture, all unknown to their colleagues and families. Most DL men identify themselves not as gay or bisexual but first and foremost as black. To them, as to many blacks, that equates to being inherently masculine.
And to give equal time to this issue, here's an article where the writer postulates that the whole phenomenon is somewhat of a myth. I would concur with this writer that it isn't a matter that affects only one ethnicity (i.e. this isn't only a "black" issue)--I think it crosses racial, ethnic and cultural lines--and is probably more likely to be found in any culture where family, cultural traditions, religion, and a tight-knit community take center stage:
http://www.slate.com/id/2161452