Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Journalists Traveling With Obama Warned By Saudis: Report Only On Obama Or Else

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 06:01 PM
Original message
Journalists Traveling With Obama Warned By Saudis: Report Only On Obama Or Else
Does anyone ever remember this kind of warning when idiot son was around?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/01/journalists-traveling-wit_n_209912.html

Journalists Traveling With Obama Warned By Saudis: Report Only On Obama Or Else

First Posted: 06- 1-09 03:03 PM | Updated: 06- 1-09 03:09 PM


TIME's Michael Scherer, who will be accompanying President Obama on his trip to Saudi Arabia Tuesday, reports that he has been warned by the U.S. State Department that, while in Saudi Arabia, he is not to report on anything except the President's visit lest he "risk arrest and detention by Saudi authorities."

Scherer writes that "by agreement between the Obama Administration and the Saudi government, the White House press corps will be severely restricted while in the country," and he shared with readers the instructions sent to him by the State Department:

The Saudi government is permitting journalists accompanying President Obama entry into the country without a visa or the usual customs procedures. While in Saudi Arabia, therefore, journalists are expressly prohibited from leaving the hotel or engaging in any journalistic activities outside of coverage of the POTUS visit. Those who do so risk arrest and detention by Saudi authorities.


In February, the State Department's 2008 Human Rights Report on Saudi Arabia discussed at length limitations on freedom of the press in that country:

The Basic Law does not provide for freedom of speech or the press, and the government generally did not respect these rights in practice. Several major media outlets were owned by members of the royal family, and individuals were not permitted to criticize the royal family publicly. The government actively impeded criticism and monitored citizens' political activity. In rare cases, individuals criticized specific government bodies or actions publicly without repercussions.


According to the Basic Law, the media's role is to educate the masses and promote national unity. Media outlets can legally be banned or publication temporarily halted if they are deemed to promote "mischief and discord, compromise the security of the state and its public image," or if it "offends a man's dignity and rights." The government continued to restrict freedom of speech and press by interrupting publication and dissemination of news sources critical of the royal family or of Islam. Authorities prevented or delayed distribution of foreign print media, effectively censoring these media and publications. During the year media discussions took place that tested the boundaries of permissible topics for media coverage, including political and social reforms, actions of government ministries, domestic and child abuse, rights of women and human rights, corruption, drug and alcohol abuse, crime rates and violence, trafficking in persons, HIV/AIDS, and the religious police.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. why is O going there? Are we going to get hand-holding pictures out of his visit too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Any Middle East peace process must have input from the nation that contains Mecca.
Edited on Mon Jun-01-09 06:09 PM by ClarkUSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Really?
"Are we going to get handholding pictures out of his visit, too?"

A quote from the Rude Pundit is in order.. "Stop acting like the other guy is still President, you poor, traumatized bastards."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5696214
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. !!!
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. It's my favorite
quote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I can see why.
Edited on Mon Jun-01-09 07:43 PM by ClarkUSA
:fistbump:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. the only thing that prevents me from wanting this monarchy overthrown
is the likelyhood that it will be replaced by the most brutal misogynistic theocracy the world has ever known. one with billions in cash reserves, limitless reserves of oil, and an ability to strangle shipping through the suez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackeens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. It kills me that he's going there at all, it's a vile 'regime'.
I know, it's realpolitik....but it still kills me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. And How Many Of The Alleged 9/11 Hijackers Came From Saudi Arabia?........nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackeens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. UPDATE: Looks like the Saudis have backed down. We'll see what happens.
Saudis to permit journalism

A Saudi government spokesman emails that Saudi Ambassador Adel Al-Jubeir says the State Department's warning that journalists may not report in the country is "inaccurate."

"Journalists are free to go wherever and report on whatever they want," emails Karen Hanretty of Qorvis Communications, which represents the Kingdom. "As evidence, Michael is going to help facilitate media inquiries and requests."

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0609/Saudis_to_permit_journalism.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Wow..a hundred
an eighty degee-er!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackeens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I hope it doesn't turn out to be a 360!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Yeah, stop
right there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. uh.. yeah... That's what they say now... But If I were one of those
journalists, I'd keep good mental notes and not publish anything until I got home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 05:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC