Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama/Cong Dems clear the deck of controv issues (DADT, trade) for healthcare reform -lesson from 42

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 10:14 PM
Original message
Obama/Cong Dems clear the deck of controv issues (DADT, trade) for healthcare reform -lesson from 42
Democrats clear decks

By Ian Swanson
Posted: 06/01/09 08:01 PM

Democrats and the Obama administration are shoving aside issues that divide their party to clear the deck for healthcare reform, which is likely to dominate the rest of the legislative year.
In doing so, the administration appears to be learning from the experiences of the Clinton administration, which engaged in divisive intra-party battles over trade and gays in the military as it fought unsuccessfully for healthcare reform.
It also reflects a pivot from earlier this year, when the White House brushed off concerns that its agenda was too ambitious.

-snip-
“The sense we’re getting is, the reasons they pulled back is the fear of stirring things up when they need everyone to come together,” one Democratic aide said. The fact that the administration backed off on Panama indicates “they realize the deep concern about stirring up a fight on something that’s nonessential,” the aide said.
The administration also has not pushed Congress to end the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy on gays serving in the armed forces. Democratic consultant Paul Begala, who worked in the Clinton White House, said the rationale for that decision can be seen through a healthcare lens.

A failure to finish healthcare reform would drown out other achievements and mean “very serious risks to congressional Democrats,” Begala said, while success will “amplify” other achievements.
While Congress will certainly be working on issues other than healthcare reform, Obama has made it clear that getting a health bill done in 2009 is his top domestic agenda priority.
Obama last week said, “If we don’t get done this year, we’re not going to get it done.”

-snip-
Don’t ask, don’t tell and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) were polarizing issues in 1993 for Democrats, the last time the party held the White House and Congress. Obama’s government is filled with veterans from those wars, including Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, the face of healthcare reform as first lady in 1993.

-snip-
Democratic fortunes in 2010 will be tied to the success of healthcare reform, according to Begala, who regularly talks to Emanuel on politics and strategy.
“I believe the biggest single reason we lost Congress in 1994 wasn’t taxes, gay rights or the assault-rifle ban,” Begala told The Hill. “I believe what killed us was healthcare.”

Republicans see an opportunity if the $787 billion stimulus bill ends up serving as the 111th Congress’s pinnacle accomplishment.
“If the stimulus bill become the focus for Democratic candidates in 2010, that creates more problems for swing districts and moderate Democrats,” Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.) said in an interview.
If voters weary of bailouts are worried about deficits, the stimulus cost could come back to haunt Democrats, though so far polls indicate Americans are hopeful about the economy and pleased with President Obama’s leadership on it.

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/democrats-clear-decks-2009-06-01.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting, if true, and not just CYA rhetoric....
Edited on Mon Jun-01-09 10:16 PM by BlooInBloo
We'll see if it works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm not surprised. When legislation finds itself stuck in committee, that's generally where it will
stay until a bunch of people with crowbars pry it loose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. This would make more sense if the current Congress was as conservative as that in '93. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. 103rd Congress (1993-1995): 57 Dem Senators, 258 in the House
Almost identical numbers to today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The Dems were more conservative. And the #s were trending more conservative
even though Clinton was elected. The R's gained seats in congress in '92.

Dems were led by conservatives like Sam Nunn and Jim Cooper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Hmmm. I didn't realize that. Thanks for the info. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. when you're going to sellout to corporate America ya don't want to rock any boats first nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC