|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Onlooker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-10-09 07:08 AM Original message |
Why aren't Obama and the Democrats proposing a more progressive income tax? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-10-09 07:15 AM Response to Original message |
1. Because it's the payroll tax that is regressive, not the income tax. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-10-09 07:16 AM Response to Original message |
2. I think taxes have to be raised across the board as well as more progressive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asteroid2003QQ47 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-10-09 07:38 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Why not a bigger bang for our buck FIRST !? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-10-09 08:25 AM Response to Original message |
4. Obama had a hard enough time getting the income tax back to the Clinton yrs in the budget |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-10-09 09:55 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. Bingo. The Senate is so regressive and backward at this point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-10-09 10:00 AM Response to Reply #4 |
11. I think it's just convenient to ignore that fact. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
T Wolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-10-09 08:29 AM Response to Original message |
5. Because the preservation of the middle/working classes takes a back seat to protecting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-10-09 08:49 AM Response to Original message |
6. Obama already said he was delaying that until 2010, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleva (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-10-09 09:05 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Depends on what that tax money is used for. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-10-09 09:06 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Taxes and spending aren't really related. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleva (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-10-09 08:59 AM Response to Original message |
7. The floor in 1955 was $400,000.00 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC