Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What a surprise... another Rupert Murdoch publication caught lying about the Administration

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 02:51 PM
Original message
What a surprise... another Rupert Murdoch publication caught lying about the Administration

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/06/11/1961422.aspx#comments


The Justice Department says there has been no change in policy on giving Miranda warnings to detainees picked up in Afghanistan.

An article in the Weekly Standard says the Obama administration has ordered a change in policy, requiring agents to give Miranda warnings to all detainees. In fact, agents have from time to time given Miranda warnings to some detainees who, it's thought, might end up being prosecuted in U.S. courts. This began in the last administration.

A DOJ spokesman says there's been no new policy directive.

"There has been no policy change and no blanket instruction issued for FBI agents to Mirandize detainees overseas," spokesman Matt Miller said. "While there have been specific cases in which FBI agents have Mirandized suspects overseas, at both Bagram and in other situations, in order to preserve the quality of evidence obtained, there has been no overall policy change with respect to detainees."



Personally, I think it is wise to read the Miranda rights to anybody who might be prosecuted in U.S. courts..... And it appears that we are doing that.

But the Weekly Standard flat out distorted this story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Has any Murdoch publication been caught telling the truth?
Just wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That would be easier
to ascertain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC