Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Total US jobless rolls drop sharply ...some good news!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:03 AM
Original message
Total US jobless rolls drop sharply ...some good news!!





WASHINGTON – The total number of people on the unemployment insurance rolls dropped for the first time since early January, the government said Thursday, while new claims for benefits rose slightly.

The Labor Department said the total unemployment insurance rolls fell by 148,000 to 6.69 million in the week ending June 6, the largest drop in more than seven years. The decline is a sign that layoffs are easing.

The drop also breaks a string of 21 straight increases in continuing claims, the last 19 of which were records. A dip in continuing claims several weeks ago was later revised higher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Don't worry
The doomers and gloomers will arrive shortly to pour cold water all over it.

And maybe throw in a dour article by Barbara Ehrenreich to boot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
3.  I never understand why that either
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. not doom and gloom, I just don't like false conclusions to data.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
32. What you call "doom and gloom "
I call being realistic. A quarter of the states have seen unemployment go above 10%. Most states had unemployment go up. Many of the auto industry job cuts have yet to occur...cuts that will effect almost every state. Companies are still cutting jobs. It seems like you want to take one piece of info and celebrate that the recession is coming to an end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. They should - driving in Duluth is a total obstacle course - from one
construction site to the next. I am glad to see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Our stimulus dollars at work!! the infrastructure needs to be repaired.
I still chill thinking about the bridge collapse in Minneapolis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. While it's still a loss, it's damn clear the spigot pouring job losses is being closed.
Definitely good news; I hope the trend continues!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. actually, it doesn't prove that at all.
see my post #9.

if anything, the opposite is true: new claims continue to rise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. Benefits have run out, thus off the roles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Nope.. too early , the extension was six months
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. if everyone applied for benefits at the same time.
which would be odd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Many have been out of work for a year or better.
Sorry charlie, but the number of people unemployed has in NO way declined, quite the contrary. When the number of NEW claims goes down, then you can make that claim. There are other indicators that show much promise, but this is not one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. Forget continuing claims
The level of initial claims is the leading indicator.

That series has been falling since March.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. actually, that indicator does not support that conclusion
Edited on Thu Jun-18-09 10:13 AM by Lerkfish
their conclusion: that layoffs are easing.

the data: total number on the rolls falling, but new claims rising.

what the conclusion does not account for is that the number of people who've run out of their max allowable claims fall off the rolls automatically. And, if new claims have risen steadily, and continue to do so, then it actually indicates the opposite: that layoffs are still on the rise.
Even if people came off the rolls by securing new employment (which these figures have no way of determining), the amount of layoffs continues to increase.

this is a case of manipulation data to arrive at a desired conclusion.

(edited to change decrease to increase)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Lerk that extension was signed on Feb. 18th.. so I think it is too early
for those out of benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. irregardless, the conclusion is wrong: layoffs easing
as I stated, it actually indicates new jobless claims have never decreased, but have in fact increased.

maybe I'm not explaining it well.

Layoffs = newly jobless
jobless claims = continues to increase
their conclusion = layoffs decreasing.

their conclusion is faulty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Initial jobless claims ARE decreasing
The week-to-week data are too volatile to identify trends. Economists look at the four week moving average.

This dropped from 623K to 616K.

Further, the series peaked in March at 659K.

http://www.briefing.com/Investor/Public/Calendars/EconomicReleases/claims.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. "while new claims for benefits rose slightly."
in your OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. You didn't read my post, did you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. sorry for the confusion, however,
what I said was apropos to the OP and ITS conclusions, not a new source of information
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
31. actually, the only conclusion to reach here
considering the extension, is that the number of people that have found new work has outstripped a slight increase in new claims. People are still getting layed off, but some are now starting to hire.

While new claims rose, it wasn't enough to influence the total number on the rolls, which actually declined. If the extension wasn't in play, you would have to assume that these people dropped off the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
15. Another possible explanation
Maybe (some) people are finding jobs. Still not enough to make much of a dent, but enough to counter the new layoffs. If this is the case, we would see total employment rolls going up or at least staying about the same.

Likely some combination of new jobs, slower layoffs, and people falling off rolls. But admitting that it's some combination would take away our basis for arguing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. This is exactly correct. The length of time ppl stay on benefits is short bec they find work.
I'm legal counsel for my state's unemployment office. We went over these numbers just yesterday.

People are going back to work sooner than they were in January-March. They still have benefit weeks left on their claims but they are finding jobs. We are not sure exactly why that is since the number of new claims remains steady (at least not rising as they have been since Dec. 07). There is some evidence, far from conclusive, that employers who recently laid off employees are hiring them back.

Appeals of unemployment claims is down sharply (25%) which is also an indication people are going back to work more quickly.

I've been at the unemployment office through three recessions. We have been seeing stuff in this one we have never seen before. It will probably be some time before we really know what happened and why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Thanks for the info
Thanks for the firsthand information! Do have any other examples of anomalies not seen in prior recessions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. the biggest is how quickly it happened
We noticed the numbers were up in December 07 and it was a pretty steady increase to about June (I'm in the appeals office, we don't get the initial claim but the appeal, our numbers sky rocketed in August so I'm sort of guessing that for initial claims it was sometime in June or early July.) It went steadily up through February and there has been a steady drop the last 3 months.

They tell me that the numbers are still not at an all time high. It just feels breath taking because it was so quick. We've doubled our staff and tripled the number of incoming phone lines.

I'm the last level appeal in the agency. When I started in 1997 we had an average of 6.19 second level appeals per week. We've had 28-30 almost every week for the last couple of months. We're exhausted but grateful to have jobs. When you hear the stories we hear day in and day out, its hard to feel sorry for yourself because you haven't had a weekend off for months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
16. Good news. The recession will end this summer. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
19. California
There is a giant economic time bomb about to go off.

I won't feel we are out of this until its diffused or it we can see the effect of it failing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Now California is scary...I agree with that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Any recovery could be snuffed out
overnight if the Californian ship isn't righted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
23. People have used all the unemployment available
They have used all their extensions and are now out of unemployment, that is why the rolls have dropped for the first time since early January.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
26. this link seems to contradict the source in your OP
http://money.cnn.com/2009/06/19/news/economy/State_unemployment_report/index.htm?postversion=2009061910

Jobless rate rises in nearly all states

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Forty-eight states and the District of Columbia recorded unemployment rate increases in May, the government reported Friday. One state registered a rate decrease, and one state had no rate change.

Several states and regions posted their highest unemployment rate since the report debuted in 1976.


this just shows that using unemployment rolls as an indicator for actual unemployment is a faulty criterion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. No it doesn't
Your article is about May.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
29. The True Answer Is...
We don't know, and the data won't tell us for another three months or so. By September, we will truly know if the layoffs have stopped and/or that employment is increasing.

My hunch is that the various stimuli (both monetary and fiscal) are having the effect of keeping us out of total economic abyss.

The only correct analysis of the data at this point is that we're not declining at the same warp speed rate that we were before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC