Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gibbs' Daily presser for anyone who wants to watch:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 01:45 PM
Original message
Gibbs' Daily presser for anyone who wants to watch:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Looks like they're also going to be carrying his DSCC remarks later...
... we dont get to hear too many fund-raiser events. He'll be talking to his "own" .... good stuff!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yup!
Edited on Thu Jun-18-09 01:51 PM by jenmito
I'll be listening. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. lol, then I'll meet you back here at 7!
I'l have to move tredmill time up to 6:30 but trust me, i'll be both fired up and ready to go .... and freshly showered! lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. OK-I'll be here!
I won't be freshly showered, but since the internets don't have the ability to transmit smell, it doesn't matter. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Muslim women required to remove their veils at court appearances?
As ruled yesterday by the Michigan Supreme Court? Good grief.

Let's get that to SCOTUS quickly! That is FOUL!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It just gives judges the option
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That's supposed to be better?
I wouldn't want a judge having an option of forcing me to remove my shirt in open court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. It's not about removing clothing
Edited on Thu Jun-18-09 02:37 PM by SpartanDem
it's should ones freedom of religion trump being able the enforce court rules or any other rules for that matter I think is answer is no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. lol, and I disagree....
.... seems like I read something in civics 101 about "prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

And I can guarantee you every Muslim friend I've ever had who covered her head would consider that clothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes, but it's not blanket coverage
we don't allow polygamy or many other practices, largely your freedom leaves at your door. If you ran your around city naked I don't think it's part of my religion is going get very far with the local judge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Well, the ban on polygamy is just as odd...
... not my thing but if a consenting adult wants to marry a man with five other wives that should be her prerogative.

And how did you find out about my streaking habits? :)

The ruling is offensive and no ruling that affected Christians in a similar fashion would have even made it that far.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC