Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Publisher of Harper's resorts to distortion to call Obama a "smooth liar."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 04:56 PM
Original message
Publisher of Harper's resorts to distortion to call Obama a "smooth liar."

John R. MacArthur: Obama a very smooth liar

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

JOHN R. MacARTHUR

NEW YORK

IT ISN’T QUITE FAIR to call Barack Obama a liar. During the campaign he carefully avoided committing to much of anything important that he might have to take back later. For now, I won’t quibble with The St. Petersburg Times’s Obamameter, which so far has the president keeping 30 promises and breaking only six.

And yet, broadly speaking, Obama has been lying on a pretty impressive scale. You just have to get past his grandiloquent rhetoric — usually empty of substance — to get a handle on it. I offer a short, incomplete list, which I’m sure others could easily enlarge.

• Obama portrayed himself as the peace candidate, or at least the anti-war candidate. He is not a peace president, nor is he stopping any wars. True, he promised military escalation in Afghanistan (to blunt John McCain’s accusations of wimpishness), but well-meaning folks believed their new hero would genuinely move to end the occupation of Iraq and seriously try to negotiate with the Taliban. Instead, he has not only increased the number of troops and attacks against the Afghan insurgency, he has also expanded on George Bush’s cross-border raids into Pakistan, which have killed many civilians. The way things are going, Pakistan could become the new Cambodia and Obama the new Nixon.

In Iraq, Obama has promised to withdraw all the troops . . . unless, which means that we’re not leaving. Whether it’s 50,000 troops remaining at the “invitation” of the so-called government of Iraq, or just enough to man the 14 permanent military bases, or some combination of U.S. military personnel and private mercenaries that exceeds 50,000 soldiers, our army will almost certainly stay in Iraq past the stated deadline of Jan. 1, 2012.

• Obama said he wanted to reform Washington and “fix” its “broken” system of corrupt lobbying. But Obama is neither a reformer nor a skilled legislative mechanic. Hatched from the Daley Machine in one-party Chicago, Obama wouldn’t be president today if he rocked boats. Witness the appointment of Roland Burris by the corrupt former Gov. Rod Blagojevich to fill Obama’s Senate seat: not a word of public protest from the new administration because Burris is a made man in the Chicago Democratic organization. So what if “Tombstone Roland” can be heard on the U.S. attorney’s wiretaps of Blagojevich, dancing around the delicate question of how to raise money for Blago without appearing to be buying his seat.

more

So let me get this straight, MacArthur is calling Obama a smooth liar because he doing what he promised to do on Iraq and Afghanistan?

Also, MacArthur must have missed the episode when everyone and their brother were criticizing Obama and the Dems for trying to block Burris

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. No comment? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asphalt.jungle Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. he never claimed to be anti-war. even in his 2002 anti-iraq war speech he said he wasn't
something to he effect of: i'm not anti-war, just anti-iraq war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Pravda was better than our media
they don't even wait 4 months before completely rewriting history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Was that posted on DU?
Edited on Mon Jun-22-09 05:30 PM by redqueen
I bet any piece calling him a liar would get over 100 recs.



And on edit ... plenty of DUers were calling him a liar for doing what he said he'd do. Oh except for when he changed the timeline by a few months. Then he was called more than just a liar, he was called a war criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. This macarthur is full of crap.
Nothing smooth about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Tiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Chicago! Chicago! Chicago!
These Reich-wing psychopaths are obsessed with Chicago, as if every single resident of Chicago is somehow tainted simply by living there. The fact that Chicago has a large African-American population is probably a good indication of why the Reich hates Chicago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. He's on the left. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Tiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. That makes it even worse!
People on the left who use right-wing talking points are opportunistic and intellectually feeble, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC