|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-29-09 04:30 PM Original message |
White House thinks staying DADT will release pressure on Congress to pass legislation repealing it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
graywarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-29-09 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
1. Heard that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-29-09 04:35 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Not if you are one of the 265 that have been released on his watch. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-29-09 04:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Yeah. I only hope that the plights of Lt. Choi, Lt. Col. Fehrenbach and others get Congress to act. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikiturner (581 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-29-09 04:47 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. No, it still makes sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-29-09 04:53 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. How many lives should be sacrificed for the "sense" making? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-29-09 05:33 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. What is this signature pic? Is that the cabinet? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
graywarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-29-09 06:06 PM Response to Reply #3 |
17. True. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-29-09 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
2. That observation has often been made on this board. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-29-09 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
4. that would make more sense to me coupled with a big push to get it repealed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-29-09 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
8. LOL. I've been saying that up here the last two months |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-29-09 05:09 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. It is the first time I've heard them making it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-29-09 06:25 PM Response to Reply #8 |
18. Me too, I finally gave up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarge43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-29-09 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
9. As long as Article 125, as currently reads, is on the book, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-29-09 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
11. I'm sort of conflicted with that argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-29-09 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
12. So either way, if you're a gay service member, you're absolutely screwed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-29-09 05:32 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. That's an interesting point of view. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-29-09 06:32 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. Just keep up the rationalizations for whatever Obama does or doesn't do -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-29-09 07:28 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. I just think that there are a couple of ways you could read your analysis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-29-09 05:33 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. I don't see how it provides cover. Everybody already knows Obama is against DADT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-29-09 05:35 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Somehow I doubt those polls are accurate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC