|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-08-09 11:57 PM Original message |
Six specific steps Gates can take now on DADT while Congress debates full repeal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:07 AM Response to Original message |
1. I'm not holding my breath waiting for any of these eminently sensible suggestions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:21 AM Response to Original message |
2. Note that Murphy himself does not support the administration doing an end-run around Congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:34 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. These specific steps have nothing to do with stop loss |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:37 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Murphy said he was against the administration doing an end-run around DADT.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:48 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. I doubt he would consider these steps an "end run" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:49 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. (shrug) I'm not going to acsribe thoughts to him, not knowing much about him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:46 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. I disagree with your second point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:05 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Well the counter argument on stop loss is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:15 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. The only executive action that would circumvent the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:19 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. He is equating the continuation of the discharges with pressure on Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:27 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. I don't know where your getting this extra-legal stuff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 05:42 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC