Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Union Backs Sergeant Who Arrested Harvard Professor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
masuki bance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 05:11 AM
Original message
Union Backs Sergeant Who Arrested Harvard Professor
The union representing the police sergeant who arrested a prominent black Harvard professor last week at his home in Cambridge, Mass., said it was standing behind the officer. The union, the Cambridge Police Superior Officers Association, said in a statement that Sergeant James Crowley was a “highly respected veteran supervisor” who had its “full and unqualified support.” “His actions at the scene of this matter were consistent with his training, with the informed policies and practices of the department, and with applicable legal standards,” the statement said. The professor, Henry Louis Gates Jr., has asked for an apology from Sergeant Crowley, who was investigating a report of a possible break-in at the Gates residence. He arrested Professor Gates on disorderly conduct charges, but the charges have since been dropped. Sergeant Crowley told The Associated Press that he had followed proper procedures and would not apologize.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/23/us/23brfs-UNIONBACKSSE_BRF.html?_r=1

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 05:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. I hate this part of a story like the Gates thing.
I totally support unions, and would expect them to do just this, defend one of their own. That goes for all unions, including this one. But it sucks when you really feel that a union person is wrong. And I do feel the officer was wrong here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Agreed
Without knowing the facts of the situation (I really haven't kept up on the story) this is still the job of the union to back it's member. That is what they do and why he pays union dues. As to the right or wrong of what happened, that will sort itself out over time. I suspect that the officer was wrong, but I wasn't there, so I will no make a judgement on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasProgresive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. The union is doing its job-even if they find it distasteful
The same holds true for defense attorneys. With out a spirited defense there is no due process.
We could send this cop to Guantanamo - that would be real justice. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. What makes you think they find it distasteful?
This is a police union after all. Most cops aren't all that uncomfortable with arresting people for no damn reason especially when the person arrested is not white.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasProgresive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. You read that wrong
I didn't assume that the union would find it distasteful I wrote that even IF they did. That is a possibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. My mistake then. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 05:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ok, so now this is war!
Great!


:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. The union doing what the members pay for
Backing the rank and file.

Sometimes the union is wrong as well but never the less, they are obligated to support the union member.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. precisely correct.
It iw what Unios do. They always defend their own.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklnDem75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. It's what they do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC