Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I know how health care reconciliation is likely to work out in the Senate.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 12:02 PM
Original message
I know how health care reconciliation is likely to work out in the Senate.
Edited on Sat Aug-01-09 12:08 PM by backscatter712
People keep mentioning the Byrd rule, and how things unrelated to budgeting and spending will be mercilessly axed from any bill under reconciliation rules. They're not thinking far enough ahead. All we have to do is hold GOP porkbarrel and pet spending projects hostage!

What we would actually see under a reconciliation bill is two health care bills: one under reconciliation, one not.

In the reconciliation health care bill, we thrown in all the spending, all the cuts, all the taxes, all the stuff we can reasonably throw in the bill and have it pass under reconciliation bills.

Everything else goes in the non-reconciliation bill.

In the reconciliation bill, we also throw in a huge number of merciless budget cuts to programs in red states and districts, mostly Republican porkbarrel porgrams, but anything we can use to put GOP balls in a vice. It's easy to justify - it's budget cuts required to ensure the health care program does not increase the deficit, and complies with reconciliation rules.

Shove the bill through under reconciliation, with a straight party-line vote, and watch the Rethugs scream and howl.

Next, put the non-reconciliation bill on the table. At this point, we have 'em by the short & curlies. Tell the Rethugs that we'll put some of their pork back in the non-reconciliation bill, and only that bill, if they vote for it, and allow things like a strong public option and strong health care subsidies. Emphasize that their pork will go in no other bill. It goes in the non-reconciliation health care bill, or it never sees the light of day again. And we can enforce that with our own filibusters - we only need 40 reliable Democrats to keep their pork hostage.

Watch the GOP piss and moan and howl and wail some more, then in a few days, watch them fold like cheap lawn chairs and give us 60 votes.

Voila, health care reform!

Of course, that's assuming it comes to reconciliation. We only need threaten to play these sorts of games, and watch as the GOP magically becomes more willing to work constructively... :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Now all we need to do is...
...replace Spineless Harry with you. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why. . .That's just "crazy" enough to WORK!!
Edited on Sat Aug-01-09 01:51 PM by annabanana
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Watch Howard Dean threaten JUST THAT:
Beautiful thing to watch Frist twist:

http://www.charlierose.com/view/interview/10524
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm kicking this because I **LIKE** the idea!
I will kick it into Monday for the cuberat's edification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Now if only Harry Reid had the nads to actually implement this strategy...
But I suspect Obama's gonna be leaning hard on Reid and demanding he get his shit together, and probably insisting he play some hardball...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. Rec'd and a
Best of Luck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-03-09 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. BIG Monday kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC