Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Deal or no Deal: Dem Senators say WH denies Big Pharm deal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 09:05 PM
Original message
Deal or no Deal: Dem Senators say WH denies Big Pharm deal
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/06/dem-senators-white-house_n_253502.html


A senior White House aide told Democratic senators Thursday that the administration did not make a deal with the pharmaceutical lobby that would prevent Congress from using the government's clout to negotiate for lower drug prices, according to three Democratic senators who were in the meeting.

The New York Times had reported on Thursday morning that the White House affirmed that a deal barring price negotiations had been struck.

Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) asked two top White House aides, David Axelrod and deputy White House chief of staff Jim Messina, if the administration had cut such a deal with PhRMA.

"He says there's no deal. I take him at his word," Brown told the Huffington Post.

The drug makers, according to the Times, had agreed to trim $80 billion in costs over ten years and the White House agreed not to go after deeper cuts by negotiating lower drug prices as part of comprehensive health care reform. The paper reported that Messina confirmed the deal on the record.

Brown said the article inspired his question. Both Messina and Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) answered.

"Baucus said there was no deal and the White House said there was no deal," said Brown.

Brown added that the answer didn't necessarily mean the White House was contradicting what it told drug makers.


"It contradicts what Billy Tauzin said told the drug makers, but Billy Tauzin has not always been all that straight with the truth," said Brown, referring to PhRMA's president, a former Republican congressman from Louisiana. Tauzin pushed through the original law that barred the government from negotiating for lower prices. Shortly thereafter, he left to lobby for the drug makers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Perhaps there was no legal contract but just an "understanding". ROFL n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. a wink and a nod maybe
but seems like Tauzin has been outplayed either way. Even if there was a deal, Congress doesn't have to stick by it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Agree but I'm sick of the whole mess and know in the end corporations will get richer and the People
will get a few crumbs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe Tauzin made a backroom deal with Emmanuel
And Rahm didnt tell anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. You mean the MSM wasn't
being honest?

Shocking!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. What else is new?
I gave up watching much of it recently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Another day same shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. Amazing how that hit piece turned up in the NYT,
and how many people have chosen to conveniently believe Tauzin!

Is the timing a coincidence,
or was the story put out there in order to deflate support for this President's agenda
from the progressives?

I've already decided....
and I'm not believing those who have lied to me over and over again before.
Just think "March to War" and "Republicans", and tell me why I should disbelieve
this administration, who already well publicized the "deal" they had with the Drug Companies,
but the deal wasn't that deal. If the deal was "that" deal, then the Tauzin would have
said so then.....as the questions were all asked at the time.

PhRMA In The Game: Tauzin Pitches Universal Rx Coverage At Health Summit
March 10, 2009
http://www.biopharmatoday.com/2009/03/-phrma-in-the-game-tauzin-pitches-universal-rx-coverage-at-health-summit-.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC