So, let me get this straight. A verbal or written threat against the
SeattleGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Mon Aug-17-09 04:34 PM
Original message
So, let me get this straight. A verbal or written threat against the
Edited on Mon Aug-17-09 04:48 PM by SeattleGirl
President is against the law, correct? But carrying a weapon to an event that the POTUS will be at is just fine? :banghead:
polichick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Mon Aug-17-09 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Apparently because "intention" is unclear - they could just be "protecting themselves." nt
havocmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Mon Aug-17-09 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. One wonders if it could be that gun which is not seen
Common Sense Party
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Mon Aug-17-09 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Definitely. One needn't wonder at all.
The effective assassin won't be standing out in the open with a visible handgun strapped to his scrawny, pasty thigh.
MiaCulpa
(741 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Mon Aug-17-09 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
If it were GWB, the guy would be dead already, no doubt. -Diane
elocs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Mon Aug-17-09 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Oh yeah! He might not be dead, but you wouldn't hear from him or about him anytime soon.
lisa58
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Mon Aug-17-09 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. If you're not breaking the gun laws of the State how can they stop you?
SeattleGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Mon Aug-17-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I know that. I'm just saying it seems pretty damned strange to me
that verbal threats are taken more seriously than someone carrying a loaded weapon is.
lisa58
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Mon Aug-17-09 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I know what you mean, I don't get the gun thing at all, but...
...the guy in NH made me realize that if he wasn't allowed to carry his gun to defend himself, his rights were being violated - and I'm all about rights not being violated.
eppur_se_muova
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Mon Aug-17-09 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. See my suggested "compromise" here ...
Peacetrain
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Mon Aug-17-09 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
Hutzpa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Mon Aug-17-09 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's cuckoo land of conditional rights
remember, its the same constitution that gave us Liberty tree. :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :silly: :silly:
lunatica
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Mon Aug-17-09 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. They're not in the event. They're outside and across the street from it
And they never see Obama at all.
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.