Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

THEY'RE AGAINST CO-OPS, TOO....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 09:28 AM
Original message
THEY'RE AGAINST CO-OPS, TOO....

THEY'RE AGAINST CO-OPS, TOO....

The NYT reports today, "The White House has indicated that it could accept a nonprofit health care cooperative as an alternative to a new government insurance plan, originally favored by President Obama. But the co-op idea is so ill defined that no one knows exactly what it would look like or how effectively it would compete with commercial insurers."

It's going to be tough to rally support for an idea when it's not altogether clear what it is, or how it would work. Ezra Klein had an item noting the differences between a co-op and a public option, and concluded, "As the situation stands, there's no existing model for co-ops to follow and no policy specifics on Conrad's idea, so it's impossible to say whether, or how, they will work. I could imagine very good co-ops or totally useless ones."

more




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Tell Kent Conrad, STAT! He's sounding like a broken record.
Edited on Tue Aug-18-09 09:30 AM by babylonsister
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=6335544&mesg_id=6335544

Conrad On Whether His Co-Op Proposal Will Bring Down Costs Of Health Care: ‘Uhhh, No’
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The public option won't bring down the cost of health care, either.
Just slow the increase.

That is what Kent Conrad is claiming the co-ops would do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Do you have a link to prove that? If the middle man is excluded,
it absolutely will bring down the costs.

That's part of the whole point of this drill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Link
http://letters.salon.com/opinion/feature/2009/08/12/reich/view/index4.html?show=all


Letter to Salon discussing an op-ed by Robert Reich


"What do you mean when you say that “the public option is essential for controlling costs”? The CBO has already stated that the public option will increase costs – so in light of this fact, do you contend that the CBO’s numbers aren’t correct. or that the CBO is lying?

You are talking about two different things: (Robert) Reich is referring to the total cost to provide health care to everyone in the US, while you and the CBO are only talking about the govt's piece of that overall pie.

This plan will almost surely drive up the cost to the govt. of providing health care to citizens. This is primarily due to it giving subsidies to the poor and near poor, so that everyone can buy into health insurance. That has to be paid for and it has a cost on the order of $100B/yr, which isn't chump change but isn't a huge % of govt. spending

Reich is referring to the fact that a public option would be very cost competitive for lots of different reasons and would force private insurers to trim their profits, their overhead and their overall cost. Over time, it would help slow the rate of increase in health insurance premiums for everyone.

- jschultz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. OK. It will drive up costs 'to the government' initially. I 'get' that.
But not to individuals.

This will be a massive undertaking, and it will cost. That's why so many people are balking at doing anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. To clarify my own views...
My first choice would be the UK system.

My second choice would be the Canadian system.

My third choice would be a good public option (available to all employers; pays doctors at Medicare rates.)

My fourth choice would be a lousy public option (only available to employers with under 25 employees; pays doctors much more than Medicare.)



3 & 4 would probably cause private insurance premiums to increase more slowly, but not actually cause private insurance premiums to be less than they are today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Fuck Kent Conrad
and his charts and his dissertations. I watched him on the senate floor many times during the Bush years howling at the moon and he NEVER stopped one single thing Bush wanted his republicans to do. Get on the fucking team asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. They will vote against any bill. The aim now is just to water it
down as much as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. That's why the republicans & insurance corporations are hoping co-ops pass, nothing will change & no
fearful profit killing public option....they'll do anything including kill, to kill a public option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. They're hoping for no such thing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. Of course they are. We wanted single payer they said no, we said ok how about
public option, they said no, we said ok how about co-ops of course they are going to say no. We are giving them any and everything they want or don't want in this case.Why should they concede anything?:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
9. They want nothing but to tack on more debt by getting some tax cuts
and making insurance mandatory for their "responsibility culture" bullshit without really doing anything on access or affordability.

You can't tell me you are negotiating but aren't giving up anything. When we make a concession to the Republicans what is it that they give us? There are zero votes and they couldn't get us more than five even if we let them write the bill. That's worthless. How in God's name can they go on TV in front of the American people and whine about bi-partisanship but cannot even describe anything that they could get on board with.

Why no one asks them what kind of healthcare bill could get wide Republican support, what could get half, what could get a fourth? They need to be accountable for having no answer on that by not having a voice until they are honest brokers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
12. Its obvious they won't vote for this no matter what is removed or added to appease them.
Edited on Tue Aug-18-09 10:36 AM by Cass
Yesterday on CNN a republican talking head was asked point blank if the public option was removed would republicans support a health care reform bill? She hemmed and hawed and even when pressed would not say they would support any bill. This is the same thing they did with the stimulus bill...they carried on and made various demands, some of which were implemented in the bill, then not one of them voted for it anyway.

Democrats need to concentrate on crafting a decent bill then work on getting their members in line and vote it through regardless of republicans. Republicans are proving to be nothing more than whining obstructionists who value party politics over the American people. They had a chance to be part of this but choose not to be involved in any meaningful way so its time to move on without them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
14. They're against health care reform, period. Which is why we should forget about bipartisanship and
just do this thing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
15. I posted on this last night-- it means that they might as well go for a public option or more
Edited on Tue Aug-18-09 11:52 AM by andym
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NecklyTyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-19-09 05:17 AM
Response to Original message
16. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-19-09 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
17. back to Square One . . . simply open Medicare up to everyone . . .
with a sliding scale of premiums based on the ability to pay . . . let insurance companies offer supplemental coverage to those who want it, and "golden" policies to those who can afford them . . . inaugurate a national energy conservation and weatherization program (or some other program addressing a critical national problem), and offer job re-training in those fields to insurance company employees who lose their jobs in the transition . . . thus killing the proverbial two birds (healthcare and energy conservation) with one stone . . . and making the nation a better place to live for everyone . . .

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC