Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Obama "caving" to the Republicans or to the Blue Dogs?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 09:30 AM
Original message
Is Obama "caving" to the Republicans or to the Blue Dogs?
I personally find the whole "capitulation" regarding the PO to be BS because, at least at the moment, Obama has continued to voice support for it and has stated that he wants it. It's true he hasn't waved his pen like Bill Clinton and said that he would refuse to sign any legislation that didn't include it (how did THAT turn out?), so I suppose his commitment could be called into question on those grounds.
However, assuming that the corporate media whores are really telling *the truth* and Obama has really "caved" on the idea of the PO, the question I have is WHO he has "caved" to. A lot of the people whom maintain that he has "caved" already claim that he is caving to the Republicans. My personal opinion is that if he does eventually "cave" on the PO, it will NOT be the Republicans to whom he is "caving" but rather the Blue Dogs in our own party. Why? Because Obama is almost virtually guaranteed to receive NO Republican votes on ANY plan that comes out of a Democratic-controlled Congress. The answer to why this is case should be plainly self-evident but the Republicans are essentially irrelevant at this point but for the Blue Dogs. True, Obama is TRYING to get something bipartisan passed but the Republicans are clearly far more interested in defeating health care reform just to bloody him. Obama's not dumb, however. IMHO he knows this but he is trying to at least give the appearance of trying to reach out to the other side for right now. When push comes to shove, he has indicated that he will work around the Republicans to get something through in the end and I believe him.
The REAL challenge that he is facing seems to be from members of his own party, the *celebrated* Blue Dogs like Baucus, Conrad, etc. whom are trying to prevent PO from being part of any legislation and are are trying to push their own alternatives like, in Conrad's case, the Co-ops. However, they seem to generally support health care reform and would be hard-pressed to vote against something in the end. So far, the Senate is where things are currently stymied and need to move forward. As another poster pointed out earlier today, what is most important right now is moving a bill out of the Senate, with or without a PO, and into conference committee where the real fight over the PO or anything else can begin. If, in the end, Obama gives up on the PO, I don't think that it will be because of the Republicans but rather the Blue Dogs IMHO.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is there any meaningful difference between the two?
It seems more like a labeling issue when we look at what they actually do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The Blue Dogs will almost certainly vote for health care reform (in some form)
The Republicans, aside from maybe Snowe and Collins, will NOT no matter what it's in the final legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. But what sort of "reform" will they vote for? That's the question.
They will probably not vote for anything that actually reforms the system. Instead, they will support something weak and ineffectual, if not outright damaging, like taxpayer subsidies for the insurance companies, and then crow about how they have saved the world.

The Republicans, while vile, are at least honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Whichever form gets them the most donations from healthcare lobbyists
And anything else would be downright bad game theory! More Money, More Power, More Corruption!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. BINGO!
They will do what their masters want them to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. The co-op trial balloon,
... it was launched clumsily last Saturday... Rest assured it's back in the shop now, and it will rise again I fear, with less controversy and more success in the coming weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. bingo, bingo , bingo...neither..he is capitulating to big Pharma and the insurance big boys! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. THAT, of course, remains to be seen
It will largely depend on what comes out of the conference committee. However it emerges, I defy a single one of them to vote against it. Obama put Baucus on the spot last week and I don't think it will help his career nor image to vote against a health care reform package even if it includes the dreaded (to him) PO.

Let's let Baucus et. al come up with a plan and get it through the Senate and see what ultimately emerges from committee first before we all start freaking out and accusing Obama of "caving" to anybody. It already sounds like Conrad's plan is starting to get more scrutiny and NOT in a positive way. The guy just admitted that it wouldn't really help with costs, which is one of the big reasons that we're doing all of this. It would be nice if Baucus and his "Gang of Five" would have to reveal THEIR *superior* plan and explain to us how it's going to be better than PO since they are clearly NOT on board with it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. Neither.
This is a marathon not a sprint. Until the final bill is divulged all of this is posturing. Make sure that you have voiced your position to your reps and the prez. That is the only way to be counted. Encouraging like minds to check in with their reps will increase your chances of getting the legislation that you want. Obama is not stupid. If the peeps really did put him in office with personal contributions then he will not be foolish. If that was all a ruse then our boat was sunk ten months ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
9. Doesn't matter. It looks as if he's put his balls in and escrow account;
For all the good he's not doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. He's bowing to the corporations who are behind both the Blue Dogs & the Republicans--
the same corporations from which he's selected most of his cabinet & advisors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. He is betraying his supporters and the American people.
I'm disgusted by this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jesus_of_suburbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. Can he not force the Blue Dogs? I thought that was why he hired pitbull Emanuel.
:shrug:

We all know Emanuel is a DLC'er, but I thought Pres Obama hired him because he could push through his agenda.


:shrug:



Otherwise, why did he hire a DLC'er?


:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC